Jérémie Beucler

@jeremiebeucler.bsky.social

PhD with Wim De Neys, Zoe Purcell & Lucie Charles at UPC/CNRS, Paris Reasoning | Cognitive Biases | Metacognition | CompModeling https://jeremie-beucler.github.io/

**Please repost** If you're enjoying Paper Skygest -- our personalized feed of academic content on Bluesky -- we'd appreciate you reposting this! We’ve found that the most effective way for us to reach new users and communities is through users sharing it with their network

Post nicht verfügbar.

New preprint from the lab. We think we have a solution (two, actually) to a long-standing problem in the field of response inhibition. Using two different mathematical approaches, we think we can identify long-hypothesized inhibitory 'trigger failure' trials. More in🧵 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Two types of response inhibition failures in humans

Response inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inh...

biorxiv.org

Yet another (popular) article on human/LM reasoning that (as usual) I'm deeply disappointed to see casually presupposes that humans do something called "reasoning" that's implied to be linking together steps that logically follow without any qualification, then proceeds to be dismissive 1/

"Reasoning comes in many technically defined forms(opens a new tab), but the basic procedure is easily recognizable: arriving at a sound conclusion by linking together intermediate steps that logically follow from each other. We do this with thoughts; LRMs use so-called chains of thought [...]" from https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-ai-reasoning-right-for-the-wrong-reasons-20260731/

Are you "thinking in vain"? 🫵 Take this (very short) test and see for yourself: jeremie-beucler.github.io/thinking_in_... 🔗 Paper: osf.io/preprints/ps...

a mashup of different figures showing:
- left: a biased DDM model showing the trajectory of a biased reasoner and a bayesian reasoner in a base-rate neglect task
- right: simulations of this model showing evidence map for biased reasoner and relationship between bias weight and decision boundary and accuracy
Jérémie Beucler@jeremiebeucler.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Are you thinking in vain? New paper with @zoepurcell.bsky.social, @luciecharlesneuro.bsky.social, @wimdeneys.bsky.social & @kobedesender.bsky.social 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘝𝘢𝘪𝘯: 𝘈𝘯 𝘌𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 🔗 osf.io/preprints/ps... A 🧵

a man hanging from a scale where on one side there are really heavy stereotypes, and on the other side very light base-rates, to illustrate base-rate neglect

🚨New WP "@Grok is this true?" We analyze 1.6M factcheck requests on X (grok & Perplexity) 📌Usage is polarized, Grok users more likely to be Reps 📌BUT Rep posts rated as false more often—even by Grok 📌Bot agreement with factchecks is OK but not great; APIs match fact-checkers osf.io/preprints/ps...

Bild

🎉 Our paper is out in Communications Psychology: a perspective on behavioural public policies & the psychology of poverty. Core idea: poverty can shift psychology, so the same intervention won’t work the same for everyone. Thread 🧵

Self-control—the ability to ignore short-term temptations in favour of long-term goals—leads to better health, career success, financial security, but does it lead to wellbeing? New research suggests it’s the other way around, writes @ewdolan: buff.ly/u7HGaMz

Bild