Andy Wheeler

@crimede-coder.bsky.social

Data scientist, with background in criminal justice. Consulting website at https://crimede-coder.com/ Personal blog at https://andrewpwheeler.com/

New blog post, using extra credits to just churn out ideas I have had for years. Peer reviewed papers were always symbolic. The ease you can write them now I am hoping spurs academics to consider "doing things in the real world" as a measure of success. andrewpwheeler.com/2026/09/24/a...

Adventures in using AI to write papers

Until recently I had only used the AI tools pay-as-you-go, but lately I have been experimenting with the $20 monthly subscription. So I ended up with extra credits to burn. I would periodically jus…

andrewpwheeler.com

Part of the difficulty in writing a book on LLM APIs is that they change so often. LLMs for Mortals is 6 months out, and I wrote a recap of updates needed so the book recompiles (mostly just newer model strings). crimede-coder.com/blogposts/20... See post for promo for EPUB and print versions.

LLMs for Mortals 6 months later

I recompiled Large Language Models for Mortals six months after release. Here is what broke, what I got right, and what I got wrong.

crimede-coder.com

Part of the difficulty in writing a book on LLM APIs is that they change so often. LLMs for Mortals is 6 months out, and I wrote a recap of updates needed so the book recompiles (mostly just newer model strings). crimede-coder.com/blogposts/20... See post for promo for EPUB and print versions.

LLMs for Mortals 6 months later

I recompiled Large Language Models for Mortals six months after release. Here is what broke, what I got right, and what I got wrong.

crimede-coder.com

New blog post on veruscite, several academic papers scan large corpi of papers and estimate the rate of hallucinated citations to be ~1%. I think this estimate is likely low, as they only scan title differences. Authors being wrong is another common source veruscite.com/blog/halluci...

Why estimates of hallucinated citations are probably low

Large scale audits of fabricated references only match on titles. Hand-checking the 10 most recent papers in the hall of hallucinations, a third of the errors were a real title with the wrong authors ...

veruscite.com

New blog post on veruscite, several academic papers scan large corpi of papers and estimate the rate of hallucinated citations to be ~1%. I think this estimate is likely low, as they only scan title differences. Authors being wrong is another common source veruscite.com/blog/halluci...

Why estimates of hallucinated citations are probably low

Large scale audits of fabricated references only match on titles. Hand-checking the 10 most recent papers in the hall of hallucinations, a third of the errors were a real title with the wrong authors ...

veruscite.com

Hallucination of the day is a bit meta -- an article about using Knowledge graphs to prevent hallucinations in LLMs. It is another example of Google Scholar indexing a fake paper. The authors created this fake paper in a paper in 2025, and it persisted to their more recent 2026 paper.

BildBildBild