Alexey Tolchinsky

@tolchinsky.bsky.social

Clinical psychologist and researcher https://alexeytolchinsky.com/

AI has made it easy to construct the form of an academic paper without any true insight, and that’s not going away. We might have to move from peer review to peer recommendation. All papers get uploaded to a server, w/ an overlay where experts point to the good ones. The rest can just be ignored.

Ben Williamson@benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 3w ago

The anatomy of an AI-supported academic article is becoming more apparent. I desk reviewed ~70 manuscripts this week for our journal. Reckon 20ish had significant AI assistance. On top of hundreds of others recently I'm starting to see patterns. Are other editors are seeing the same or similar? 1/

Ever wanted to talk to a gene regulatory network? Ever wonder what they could do in a different context, embodiment, space? New preprint - part of our approach for developing ways to talk to cells, organs, and much much weirder agents: @yanbozhang123.bsky.social arxiv.org/abs/2605.16321 🧪

Language Game: Talking to Non-Human Systems

Language carries thought and coordination among humans but rarely reaches further along the spectrum of diverse intelligence. Yet non-neural systems -- from gene regulatory networks and microbial cons...

arxiv.org

Erik Hoel makes a compelling case for "why sex" as opposed to reproduction via cloning. substack.com/home/post/p-... Some planaria reproduce by asexual fission and they are indeed highly resilient, as @drmichaellevin.bsky.social's work shows. Seems that fission eliminates error accumulation.

IVF epigenetic damage gets worse across generations; The next Project Hail Mary; AI's "odorless" math proofs; Waymo at 100% human oversight? & more

Desiderata #39

substack.com