Lady Baroness HRH Princess Furball πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈπŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ

@ladybaroness.bsky.social

For services to cat food. Woke lefty, mum to a transgender human being. Archaeology. Nature. Sci-Fi. Discworld. Classical music. Cats & other floofs. Resident of #WΓΌlferhampton. Xitter refugee. Unsolicited DMs = instant 🚫 unless I know you so don’t bother.

🌈 LGBTQ β€˜come out’ every day, but my official coming out was met with β€œwe already know”, β€œabout bloody time” and, β€œwe knew before you” πŸ™„πŸ˜‚ I was very fortunate, lots of people aren’t. DM’s open if you’re having a tough time 🫢

Bild

I went for the β€˜factually incorrect’ complaint to target their attribution of DrBeth Upton as a respondent in a case that’s exclusively between Peggie & her nursing union. Following on from that their whole rehash of the Tribunal & use of the transphobic style sheet description of a Dr Beth Upton.

Article incorrectly describes the case
 The article states:
 'This is the second employment tribunal Peggie has brought over the dispute
 with Dr Beth Upton, a biological male who identifies as a woman!
 This case is between Peggie and her nursing union, Dr Beth Upton is in no way
 involved in this case. This is factually incorrect attribution of the respondents.
 Dr Upton was completely exonerated by the Tribunal and she should not be
 attributed as being part of this case, as such there is little justification in
 rehashing the previous Tribunal timeline or using a derogatory description of Dr
 Beth Upton a Trans woman as 'a biological male who identifies as a woman:
 This phrase may be in your style guide but given Dr Upton is only tangentially
 involved should not be used in this report.

Burnham shows no signs of undoing the Blue Lab culture wars, if anything his Govt is doubling down on the very worst aspects: -Retention of Mahmoud - retrospectively changing permanent residency for legal immigrants -Retention of Phillipson - implementation of the unworkable EHRC Code of Practice

Dan Sohege@danielsohege.bsky.social Β· 2w ago

Labour's immigration/asylum policies are profoundly racist and xenophobic. They embolden far right, undermine international law and violate basic human rights, while being even more hostile than the previous government. They can't be tweaked. They need to be scrapped. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...