This. But I’d take it further. Most humans are most often substantially less logical and more biased than frontier models. Humans are still much smarter in many crucial ways, but internal consistency is not one of them.
Yet another (popular) article on human/LM reasoning that (as usual) I'm deeply disappointed to see casually presupposes that humans do something called "reasoning" that's implied to be linking together steps that logically follow without any qualification, then proceeds to be dismissive 1/