Enza Spinapolice

@enzaspinapolice.bsky.social

Evolutionary Archaeologist | Palaeolithic Professor in Sapienza, Rome | Lithics nerd

Hello, Our paper on enamel proteins from Paranthropus robustus has finally been peer reviewed, please have a read here: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... Paranthropus robustus has been puzzling scientists since its discovery in 1938 in South Africa, where a high number of fossils have been found.

Enamel proteins reveal biological sex and genetic variability in southern African Paranthropus

Paranthropus robustus is a morphologically well-documented Early Pleistocene hominin species from southern Africa with no genetic evidence reported so far. In this work, we describe the mass spectrome...

doi.org

Yes for example, assuming the dot is actually deliberate, it's an interesting choice *not* to make a larger application of colour on that surface. On the issue of faces I think we would need a bigger corpus of examples to be more confident that is what they're really doing

I'm still highly skeptical of #Naledi "engraving" claims. Revisions in this are limited to context/discussion; avoid considering (beyond 1/2 sentence) that the features might be natural. No new documentation or analysis at all. And irrelevant comparison to Blombos painted stone is still there.

Matthew Cobb@matthewcobb.bsky.social · last yr.

Some ppl remain skeptical of the meaning of the H naledi “burials”. These striking engravings are even more enigmatic. Who made them and when?