Mathias Wullum Nielsen

@mathiaswullum.bsky.social

Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, UCPH. https://mathiaswullumnielsen.weebly.com/

It begins. Clearly incriminating evidence against president of the United States. Epstein to Maxwell, April 2, 2011: "i want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is trump. [VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc."

Bild

Four (!) three-year postdoc positions available at @au.dk: international.au.dk/about/profil... Join an incredible team & help understand the psychological & political implications of the clash between high-speed society & slow-speed democracy. Please share! @tboeggild.bsky.social can help with Qs

Four three-year postdoctoral positions in the project Slow-Motion Democracy - Vacancy at Aarhus University

Vacancy at Department of Political Science, Aarhus University

international.au.dk

The Supreme Court is out of control. To allow the president, without any explanation, to unilaterally dismantle agencies created by an Act of Congress is to endow the president with sovereignty. There is no justification, because they haven’t given one. Our country is in big trouble.

Mark Joseph Stern@mjsdc.bsky.social · last yr.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court allows the Trump administration to move forward with the abolition of the Department of Education. It gives no explanation for its order. All three liberals dissent. www.documentcloud.org/documents/25... From Sotomayor's dissent:

Lifting the District Court’s injunction will unleash
untold harm, delaying or denying educational opportunities
and leaving students to suffer from discrimination, sexual
assault, and other civil rights violations without the federal
resources Congress intended. The majority apparently
deems it more important to free the Government from paying employees it had no right to fire than to avert these very
real harms while the litigation continues. Equity does not
support such an inequitable result.
* * *
The President must take care that the laws are faithfully
executed, not set out to dismantle them. That basic rule
undergirds our Constitution’s separation of powers. Yet today, the majority rewards clear defiance of that core principle with emergency relief. Because I cannot condone such
abuse of our equitable authority, I respectfully dissent.

"...male-dominated STEM programs actually rate female applicants’ written application materials and interviews higher. Female applicants are still less likely admitted to such programs than males..." This month in our journal, @sociologicalsci.bsky.social

Sociological Science@sociologicalsci.bsky.social · last yr.

NEW: Wei-hsin Yu, Kuo-Hsien Su, "Evaluation Criteria and Women's Attainment of Elite STEM Education: Evidence from College Admission Records." sociologicalscience.com/articles-v12...

Bernie Sanders' office has put out a report this morning on Trump's NIH cuts: "Trump officials effectively cut $2.7 billion in [NIH] funding in the first three months of 2025 – including a 31 percent cut to cancer research through March, compared to the same timeframe last year."

Is anyone here on the Editorial Board of the Brill journal Comparative Sociology? Raised a concern last year about 2 papers published in the journal which used "national IQ" data. The editor & ethics team dismissed my concern without an investigation. The journal has just published another NIQ paper

Screenshot of a paper published in the Brill journal Comparative Sociology on 23 April 2025, title Stereotypes of the Intelligence of Nations, by Sebastian Jensen and Emil KirkegaardEditorial Board
Thora Margareta Bertilsson, University of Copenhagen (Denmark)
Alfons Bora, Universitat Bielefeld (Germany)
Matteo Bortolini, University of Padua (Italy)
Vincenzo Cicchelli, Université Paris Descartes (France)
Jean-Pascal Daloz, University of Strasbourg (France)
Yves Dezalay, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris (France)
Benjamin Gregg, University of Texas-Austin (USA)
Juergen R. Grote, Universität Potsdam and Hertie School of Governance, Berlin (Germany)
Jeffrey Halley, University of Texas-San Antonio (USA)
Andreas Hess, University College Dublin (Ireland)
John Higley, University of Texas-Austin (USA)
Hans-Joachim Lauth, Würzburg University (Germany)
Steven Levitsky, Harvard University (USA)
Andrea Maccarini, University of Padova (Italy)
Maria Malatesta, University of Bologna (Italy)
Wolfgang Merkel, WZB Berlin Social Science Center (Germany)
Leonardo Morlino, LUISS Guido Carli, Rome (Italy)
Gerardo Munck, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (USA)
Anton Pelinka, Central European University, Budapest (Hungary)
Huang Ping, Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (China)
Masamichi Sasaki, Chuo University, Tokyo (Japan)
Carsten Schneider, Central European University, Budapest (Hungary)
Catalina Smulovitz, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires (Argentina)
Gunther Teubner, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat, Frankfurt (Germany)
Ming-Chang Tsai, National Taipei University (Taiwan)

As we were writing this paper the NSF ADVANCE program was "archived" (cancelled). A heavy moment for us mid-paper. The results are important - check it out: ADVANCE is one of the (if not the) longest running NSF programs, and, unusually for the NSF, is a collaboration among multiple directorates. 🧵

Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World@sociusjournal.bsky.social · last yr.

🏛️ Funding #EquityInitiatives = funding academic careers New #Socius study by Drs. Gates, @lauraknelson.bsky.social, Grudt & @kzippel.bsky.social finds #NSF #ADVANCE awards help faculty doing #OrganizationalChange work maintain—or boost—#ResearchProductivity. Read: doi.org/10.1177/2378...

A longitudinal survey of political scientists shows: experts think we're slipping fast from democracy to dictatorship Which explains the administration's efforts to cut/muzzle research: it's easier to claim they're the good guys without facts/experts to get in the way www.npr.org/2025/04/22/n...

Hundreds of scholars say U.S. is swiftly heading toward authoritarianism

Most — but not all — political scientists are deeply troubled by the president's attempts to expand executive power, according to a national survey.

npr.org