okay Kelly

@kmdoublev.bsky.social

philosophy // print-making // pacific northwest https://www.bonfire.com/store/life-of-the-mind/ https://storyphi.buzzsprout.com

This plan is for acts of unspeakable harm. The article also says the expected increase comes after the admin declined to renew a contract with the org that represented immigrant children in court. They gave one instead to an org whose CEO had to resign for reasons you would not (would) believe.

Whitney Curry Wimbish@whitneycwimbish.bsky.social · yesterday

The Trump regime is looking for immigrant detention camps big enough to hold up to 3,000 children. At an industry roundtable discussion, officials wouldn't say exactly where or when they need them, only that they’re expecting a “surge.” New from me in @prospect.org.

I'm curious if anyone knows how peer review tends to work for special issues of journals with open CFPs. Are reviewers asked to read multiple submissions to rate or compare them? Or does it work more like normal peer review? #philsky

Yes! I wrote about this (relinquishing the benefit of the doubt) in section 3 of "Brazen Dogwhistles." We don't need to place our thumb on the scale of charity when we interpret possibly-racist speech. We don't need to do PR for racists in our heads. philpapers.org/rec/WEIBDV

philpapers.org

Sukaina@sukaina.bsky.social · 6d ago

exactly this. you don’t have to take the bait when you have every reason to think your interlocutor is acting in bad faith for political ends they have been exceptionally clear about

Read the Daily Nous article about PPA publishing a largely Claude-generated paper, and I cannot get over these last two paragraphs. ""The tool I'm voluntarily giving over my work to is going to destroy my profession and way of life."" Maybe don't help it do that then??

screenshot from Daily Nous guest post that says: The Future of Writing Philosophy
I suspect that in the next few years, AIs will be able to write philosophy papers without the help of a human PhD supervisor. At that point, human philosophy professors will have to find new tasks to perform. Maybe the whole job will be focused on undergraduate teaching, until AIs automate teaching. In the meantime, I hope to spend my time as a philosophy professor doing a mix of writing papers on my own and writing papers as a “PhD supervisor” for AIs.

Soon, AI will cause significant increases in the number of good philosophy papers submitted to journals. For the journal system to continue, journals must soon develop new AI-based refereeing tools, like Refine in economics, in order for journals to keep up. That said, once the number of good papers gets too large, the journal system as we know it will probably collapse.

seeing a lot of self-h*rm on this site today (reading DN comments section) and I want you all to know that help is available (I close your browser tab and spray you with the spray bottle)

"no one will be normal about AOC if she runs for president" is both true and a bad reason for her not to run. you could run the most milquetoast middle of the road clean cut straight white man alive and the right is still going to act like the deranged freaks they are