Phil Rocco

@philiprocco.bsky.social

politologue // yinzer // co-editor of Publius: The Journal of Federalism // author of "Counting Like a State" https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700638758/counting-like-a-state/ Most posts are first drafts, comments welcome.

Low-hanging fruit in next WI legislative session: a bill to require that the state print and distribute a ballot pamphlet with a plain-language summary of any referenda, along with analysis, pro-cons, supporters/opponents.

Today, the Trump administration proposed a draft rule (which we've known was coming for months) that, among other things, would take the unprecedented step of excluding a large number of noncitizens from population data in violation of the text of the 14th amendment. Two thoughts on this: 🧵

Finally, book reviews! @philiprocco.bsky.social reviewed "Ripples of Hope in the Mississippi Delta: Charting the Health Equity Policy Agenda" by the late David Kline Jones, which examines the stark disparities that define life in the Mississippi Delta. read.dukeupress.edu/jhppl/articl...

Ripples of Hope in the Mississippi Delta: Charting the Health Equity Policy Agenda | Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law | Duke University Press

read.dukeupress.edu

If you’re at #APSA26, stop by our Annual Review of American Federalism Roundtable today at 2 pm in the Westin (Parliament). Some excellent work on federal extortion, the federalization of the National Guard, party nationalization, Medicaid retrenchment, and AI policy conflicts.

Poster advertising roundtable on Annual Review of American Federalism.

At this point, I am increasingly attracted to the notion of creating a national parastatal organization that follows the data protocols CDC is ignoring here. Not the only agency that relies on state inputs to which this idea might be profitably applied, I’m sad to say.

B Jarosz@datageekb.bsky.social · 4w ago

I have always maintained that mortality records, while imperfect, are among the best data we have. This is bonkers: www.phillyvoice.com/cdc-measles-...

Would be curious to see how opinion on “hardball” (bad term) moves when you connect it to material stakes. One of the big failures of the Dem. institutional reform talk imo is that it never articulates what would happen if, say, court reform occurred. Student debt jubilee? Health care? &c

Brendan Nyhan@brendannyhan.bsky.social · last mo.

Support for constitutional hardball — seeking advantage via actions that are allowed under formal rules but break with established norms — has declined sharply among both parties since 2019, especially for previously popular tactics among Democrats

“Modern digital platforms possess the capacity to tailor compliance on a jurisdiction-specific basis, undermining claims that state regulation of online services is inherently extraterritorial or imposes unavoidable burdens on interstate commerce.” harvardlawreview.org/blog/2026/01...

Executive Preemption and the Dormant Commerce Clause After Pataki and Paxton Harvard Law Review

I. An Executive Order at Odds with Doctrinal Evolution In December, President Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Justice to challenge...

harvardlawreview.org