Joël Reland

@jreland.bsky.social

Research Fellow at UK in a Changing Europe. Looking at UK-EU relations, regulatory divergence and European politics.

This piece well worth reading on EU-UK relations by @jreland.bsky.social of UK in a Changing Europe. Could Burnham segue from economic relations to security and defence. Easier topic for EU and for PM... and could also achieve growth through defence expansion ukandeu.ac.uk/what-will-an...

What will Andy Burnham mean for EU relations? - UK in a changing Europe

Based on what we know so far, Joël Reland considers how an incoming Andy Burnham government might approach its relationship to the European Union.

ukandeu.ac.uk

My early attempt to analyse Burnham's approach to EU relations. "The paradox is that Burnham sounds less pro-European than Starmer, but is formulating an economic and security agenda which could in fact bring London into closer line with Brussels." ukandeu.ac.uk/what-will-an...

What will Andy Burnham mean for EU relations? - UK in a changing Europe

Based on what we know so far, Joël Reland considers how an incoming Andy Burnham government might approach its relationship to the European Union.

ukandeu.ac.uk

It's ten years since the EU referendum and the UK still can't agree on what Brexit should look like. Here I argue why the Lib Dems' plan to join the single market is no silver bullet. All of the 'pain' of membership without the 'gain' of having a seat at the table. ukandeu.ac.uk/no-eea-sy-op...

No EEA-sy options - UK in a changing Europe

Joël Reland argues that the Lib Dems’ call for the UK to join the EU single market may not survive contact with...

ukandeu.ac.uk

"Brexit has revealed the UK’s regulatory instincts to be much more European than many assumed." ✍️ @jreland.bsky.social looks at Brexit and regulation, arguing that despite deregulation being a key aim of Brexit, little divergence has taken place 🔗 ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-ten-y...

Brexit ten years on: regulation - UK in a changing Europe

Joël Reland reflects on Brexit and regulation ahead of the 10 year anniversary of the referendum.

ukandeu.ac.uk

The Today programme pushing the 'NI rioters have legitimate concerns' line again... Perhaps they should reflect on the role their deeply misleading series of 'undercover' reports about migrants might have played in all this

This seems a very confused piece to me. 1) Cites Switzerland as the model but then calls for single market + customs union (Swiss are in neither). 2) SM + CU is basically full EU membership but with no political/legal influence. Why choose that over rejoin? giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/...

A ‘big bang’ reversal of Brexit is both unrealistic and unnecessary

Going back would create some big new problems but Switzerland provides an alternative model

giftarticle.ft.com

New divergence tracker is out. If there's one clear message it's that - for a govt increasingly intent on EU alignment - there is an awful lot of divergence going on. Speaks to how hard it is to keep pace with the EU without formal mechanisms for dynamic alignment.

UK in a Changing Europe@ukandeu.bsky.social · 4mo ago

🚨 OUT NOW 🚨 💥 For all the latest in UK-EU regulatory alignment and divergence, check out our regular tracker by @jreland.bsky.social 🔎 It identifies all the cases of active and passive divergence and alignment, as well as any convergence between the two sides 🔗 ukandeu.ac.uk/reports/uk-e...

"Under a 10-20 year system, a worker would spend a decade or more in which their entire immigration status — and [thus] their family’s home, their children’s schooling, their right to remain — depends on maintaining the goodwill of a single employer. That is a structurally coercive relationship."

Colin Yeo@colinyeo.bsky.social · 4mo ago

New from Free Movement: Earned settlement: retrospective change is wrong but prospective change is even worse | colinyeo freemovement.org.uk/earned-settl...

Had to read this several times to be sure.. HSE consulted on making it easier to export hazardous chemicals without an importing country's consent. Only 1 in 10 agreed. Many flagged safety and env risks. HSE response? Let's do it anyway to cut 'barriers to trade' and make exports ‘more efficient’.

Nearly half of respondents disagreed with the proposal to remove the hazard
classification criteria that apply to the Designated National Authority’s consideration
of a waiver from explicit consent to import for Rotterdam Convention-listed chemicals,
with only about one in ten agreeing. A third of responses were ‘don’t know’. Other
businesses and employees tended to agree with the approach. Members of the public
overwhelmingly disagreed with the approach, and micro businesses also tended to
disagree with the approach.163. The response from industry supports HSE’s understanding that this will
remove barriers to trade, introduce more regulatory certainty, and make the process
of exporting hazardous chemicals subject to the requirements of GB PIC more
efficient. The issue of a waiver will only be considered after repeated unsuccessful
attempts to obtain a response from the importing country and will be restricted to
chemicals where there is evidence from official sources that the chemical is licensed,
registered or authorised for use there or has been used in or imported into the
importing country in the last five years.
164. HSE disagrees this will be a weakening of the regulations but instead the
amendment aligns more closely with the implementation of the UK’s obligations under
the international Rotterdam Convention. This is operated in a similar way in the EU,
in so far that EU PIC also derives from the Rotterdam Convention.
165. Next steps: The preferred course of action is that REUL Act powers would be
used to amend the waiver for explicit consent to import provision.

Here's my assessment of the govt's new memo on aligning with EU SPS rules. It tells us govt is v keen to move fast on SPS - seeing it as key to their "political argument" for closer EU relations. But the issue is a) implementation could take a while and b) voters unlikely to feel a big effect.

The government is to be credited for being clear with industry about the way ahead on the SPS deal. Early and consistent messaging will be essential for a speedy adaptation process. But for it to win the “political” argument about the benefits of closer EU ties, it will probably need to set its ambitions a lot higher.
UK in a Changing Europe@ukandeu.bsky.social · 5mo ago

"The statement sends an interesting political signal about just how keen the UK government is to get the SPS deal done." ✍️ @jreland.bsky.social on the UK government's announcement of the EU legislation ‘in scope’ for the UK-EU ‘SPS’ deal 🔗 ukandeu.ac.uk/full-speed-a...

For all the technical detail, the politics of this statement is very interesting. It shows us just how keen the govt is to get the SPS deal done: a) by unfussily committing to align with the vast majority of EU regs and b) by clearly telling businesses to get ready to adapt.

Steve Peers@stevepeers.bsky.social · 5mo ago

UK government releases list of 76 EU laws that it says UK will align with under food standards treaty with EU www.gov.uk/government/n...