just saw an insane surprisal take. time to log off
value plus discounted
@akhilrao.bsky.social
impersonal account he/him
The future is highly uncertain. There has never been a time where knowing a lot of things has been harmful and if they get the AI future they’re prognosticating things are so weird it doesn’t matter what you do. A type of Pascal’s wager. And understanding things is fun and a PhD was never about jobs
will never forget when a mathematical physicist insisted that coordinate systems were "an act of violence" and "profane". i don't remember much about him i just vividly remember him saying it with more passion than i'd heard him express all quarter in the middle of a math chat
Perhaps in the future we will be fully post-writing. But today, every time you share a result you're excited about and a significant amount of the writing is slop, it's embarrassing.
someone should write a coasean take on saas and agentic firms. I suspect the boundaries of the firm will change slowly, if at all, but it's not obvious to me which will expand and which will contract
i was on the fence about prediction #2 here. on the one hand, grok sux so why not drop an open model to at least get adoption. otoh, prediction #1 is spacex's main revenue source next year will be data center leasing, and why would you potentially undercut (lol) your biggest customers for no gain
inkblots everywhere. i guess a nice thing about it is we get to vibe out lots of predictions
little qol thing i appreciate: polytoken /clear clears context without clearing the terminal
library of babel subset where all the pre-trends graph well
has anyone checked on what taleb has to say about "math is over"? oddly curious
SpaceX is not a serious company, judging by its plans for Terafab.
existence of le chonk implies existence of le oh lawd he comin
it's funny to think that openai is showing off how cheaply they can do math compared to their peer
so far my favorite thing about zed is that word wrap is on by default. finally, a civilized editor
labor and leisure are usually modeled as distinct and exclusive uses of time. for some people in some jobs, labor and leisure are not exclusive and may not even be distinct. these facts have generated much confusion and are widely regarded as mistakes, but here we are
i missed the timing on the usage reset and it expired before i could use it
tfw u find a simple counterexample to a proposition >>>>>>
existence of gasoline implies existence of infinitely many gasopoints
compared to opus, sol is extremely... idk, neurotic? won't stop bikeshedding and overengineering, adds like a dozen gates that don't need to be there. interesting
kinda interesting to see a learning curve estimation done at the company level instead of the technology level. might even make more sense i suppose
she's just not very good at the whole skullduggery thing
silo is so stressful