Devin Garofalo

@devingarofalo.bsky.social

Writing and teaching about C19 literature, empire, race, and climate collapse. Editor of Victorian Poetry (JHUP). Lover of all things goth. She / her.

Excellent thread here on the (superb!) PMLA cluster, tracking the itineraries of “the Victorian” in the Anglo-American academy esp. under permanent-austerity conditions post-c.2008

Sarah Bull@sarahebull.bsky.social · 22h ago

Sometimes people with shared interests speak different languages. Last week I read the new Theory & Methodologies section on Victorian studies in PMLA with huge interest, especially @emilysteinlight.bsky.social and Josephine McDonagh's pieces on on US and UK scholars' ambitions for the field at +

More from Wollstonecraft's Scandinavian letters & their reports on the dawning of a modern extractivist economy ... outside Oslo the "view was almost spoilt by the depredations committed on the rocks to make alum." Alum? For dyeing? paper sizing? Environmental historians, what do you think? THANKS!

Deidre Lynch@drbibliomane.bsky.social · 2w ago

Wollstonecraft on forest fires & climate grief, from 1796: "The devastation must, indeed, be terrible, when this, literally speaking, wild fire, runs along the forest, flying from top to top, & crackling amongst the branches. . . the country, despoiled of beauty & riches, is left to mourn for ages."

This issue is stellar, & @emmadavenport.bsky.social ‘s essay is a true banger! And plz remind folks about the early career essay prize (deadline approaching) — more info below!

Victorian Poetry@victorianpoetry.bsky.social · 2w ago

A new issue of VP is live, featuring @emmadavenport.bsky.social prize-winning essay on Toru Dutt! Issue contents previewed in the image & alt-text, + a reminder abt the upcoming submission deadline for the journal’s annual early career essay prize. Please share far and wide! muse.jhu.edu/issue/57126

Issue 63.2 of Victorian Poetry is live! The full issue is open access. Its contents are as follows:

EMMA DAVENPORT, "Crediting Toru Dutt's Poetic Labor: 'Our Casuarina Tree' and Paradise Lost -- winner of VP's inaugural early career essay prize

MONICA DAVID, "'Your Harlot Roofs': Women, Individualism, and the Towers of Idylls of the King"

JAMES QUINNELL, "'The Burden of the Strain': Self and World in the Poetry of Emily Brontë and Gerard Manley Hopkins"

ELIZABETH K. HELSINGER, "Writing Toward and Against Death: Tennyson and the Rossettis"

BENJAMIN O'DELL, "Verse Novel" -- a Poetry's Parts keyword essay

In other news, Victorian Poetry invites submissions for its 2026 Early Career Prize, which recognizes exemplary essays by untenured scholars of all ranks and affiliations (including NTT and graduate student colleagues). Conferred on an annual basis, the prize carries an award of $500 and publication in Victorian Poetry. Strong essays that do not win the award may also be considered for publication as recommended by the prize committee. Submissions are due 3 August 2026. Scholars wishing to be considered should submit anonymized MS Word essays and brief CVs to victorianpoetryjournal [at] gmail [dot] com with "Early Career Essay Prize" in the subject line. Prior to submission, consult our guidelines for authors. Essays conceived and / or written with the assistance of generative AI are ineligible for the prize.

Winning articles will be selected according to three criteria: (1) significance of contribution; (2) excellence of research, interpretation, and method; and (3) efficacy of presentation. The journal continues to expand its purview to a wider compass of archives and approaches. We welcome work that capaciously (re)interprets the field's originary contexts and reconsiders Victorian poetry (broadly construed) in new, innovative, cross-disciplinary, theoretical, and / or experimental ways.

english lit and culture studies people from the last 10 years, favorite standalone articles, or book intros/chapters, that open new ways of reading / new areas of study / new paradigms and thus usefully show new grads range in the field?

My response to that "Report on the State of Scholarship in the Humanities and Humanistic Social Sciences" is up. tinyurl.com/y39crkzp As I say on Facebook, I back-loaded the good stuff, like showing that the authors' account of the 2017 Hypatia controversy reveals them to be unreliable reporters.

Report on the State of a Report (on the Humanities) - Pittsburgh Review of Books

On June 5, 2026, the Chronicle of Higher Education published an article in a genre that has unfortunately become all too familiar in that venue titled “Has

pghrev.com

“In essence, the report proposes giving a heckler’s veto to any syllabus or research project…[It is] a pseudo-intellectual pretext for administrators to remove faculty power to govern our own departments based on the standards of our disciplines.“

Phillip Maciak@pjmaciak.bsky.social · 2mo ago

WashU and Vanderbilt AAUP chapters have issued a *joint* statement on the "State of Scholarship in the Humanities" report commissioned by our university leadership. bpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com/sites.wustl....

remember when the Gaza protests @ Columbia also showed us that university deans & admins & trustees all circulate things to each other via groupchats & digital back channels, & by these means establish ideas that come to stand as the reality they then act upon together? this is how it happens!

Asheesh Kapur Siddique@asheeshks.org · 2mo ago

When something appears in the CHE, it gains a certain 'industry imprimatur' that then gets picked up by PMC-friendly outlets like the Atlantic & The New York Times, where it gets repackaged as 'common sense about higher education'

everyone, I have produced a report on how to remedy the decline of scholarship in the humanities and social sciences. here it is: Executive Summary: Fund the Humanities and Social Sciences. Body: Fund the Humanities and Social Sciences a hell of a lot more. Please cite this as the Carroll report.

It’s not too extreme to say that they make this point categorically at its conclusion, even though they repeatedly concede that in the past the university claimed to do this even while advancing incredibly noxious ideas.

Part of the raison d’être of a university is that it should engage in disinterested inquiry — inquiry aimed at knowledge and understanding, both for their own sake and for the sake of further goods that require genuine knowledge and understanding, rather than ideologically informed opinion, for their promotion. This, at least in part, is what universities are for. Indeed, it might well be thought that one of the greatest contributions a university can make to society is to provide a model of what disinterested inquiry can be and how it might thereby be of value. If the pursuit of disinterested inquiry is compromised, it strikes at the very foundation on which a university should be based, just as the corrupt administration of justice strikes at the foundation upon which a system of justice should be based.

This is somehow worse than the criticisms of it that popped up on my feed. Centrally it wants to assert as a matter of fact—“settled” in their language—that universities must be about “disinterested inquiry” and any deviation from this consensus is a problem.

Josh Shepperd@joshshepperd.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I got through a bit of this already notorious report, written by very prominent philosophers about the “decline of the humanities.” Everyone on this report is smarter than I am, yet none of them seems to understand what it’s been like to navigate the academy since the late 1990s.

I hope that people are aware that one of the primary political objectives of this ascending right-wing effort to remake higher education through things like the Vanderbilt Report, the Chicago Principles, and the AEI Future of the American University project is to crush the academic labor movement.

Sarah Osment@smosment.bsky.social · 2mo ago

One of the authors of the humanities report sat across a table and said, through a smile, that me & my writing instructor colleagues are not teachers. Still, he is welcome in my seminars on evidence, reasoning & warrant since he seems to not understand those basic aspects of academic argument.

One of the authors of the humanities report sat across a table and said, through a smile, that me & my writing instructor colleagues are not teachers. Still, he is welcome in my seminars on evidence, reasoning & warrant since he seems to not understand those basic aspects of academic argument.

Percolating on my fall theory course & would love to hear: what single essay (or chapter of a book) makes theory (interpreted however you like) or intellectual / aesthetic infrastructures concrete in ways that have stuck with you & / or you really admire? Example: Barbara Johnson, “Muteness Envy.”

"This is what it looks like when workers hold the line – it sends a message to every media company in the country that AI cannot be used to circumvent union contracts or undermine journalistic integrity." Academics please take note!

Washington-Baltimore News Guild@wbng.org · 3mo ago

🚨🚨🚨🚨 VICTORY! Following months of negotiations between @pen-guild.bsky.social leadership, WBNG, and POLITICO management, the company has agreed to shut down both AI products at the heart of last November’s landmark arbitration ruling! wbng.org/2026/05/22/p...