Not that other guy, that's for sure

@neogliberal.bsky.social

30% academic discourse; 15% games; 3% misc; 52% skeets I wrote but deleted immediately.

Just did a thing for the first time. I accepted a review with the expectation of being able to review it. I sat down, pen-in-hand, so to speak. Turns out well beyond my expertise. I thought it was one thing, but it was another. Has anyone else had to pull out of a review for a similar reason?

My feed informed me Will stancil is still at it. Imagine a person who wishes to be taken seriously in serious ways was like "teaching is way easier than teacher make out" or "accountants are clowns, really". And yet "psychologist and philosophers are too closer minded to see the obvious" is fine.

Y'all, I saw Digger. It's fine. It's actually pretty great in a lot of ways, but somehow it's less than the sum of it's parts. But it's far from boring, and has some standout moments. I'm not hearing anywhere enough love for Ganesh. I nearly stood up and punched the air when he got his monologue.

Bild

There's drama about this finding. I'm sharing here because a lot of my non-academic follows here are posting stuff like "Yup, might as well huff microplastics, death to LLMs". I'd put the genie back in the bottle if I could, but the criticism must be justified. This study isn't all that.

Carl T. Bergstrom@carlbergstrom.com · 4d ago

In our course and book _Calling Bullshit_, we posit that If something seems too good, or too bad, to be true, it probably is. Now as a college professor I'm pretty confident that overreliance can AI can harm our thinking ability, but just ten minutes of use? Let's dig into this this study a bit.

This is bad and all that ... ...but I can't think of a less reliable dataset than undergraduate essays. To say nothing of the quality of the prose, nor the accuracy of the content... it's a compromised dataset. How much of it is *already* LLM? It's gotta be at least 5%, and probably much higher.

Samuel Moore@samuelmoore.org · 2w ago

"The University of Cambridge refused to sign plagiarism detection software Turnitin’s new licence agreement, which could have allowed students’ work to be used to train artificial intelligence (AI) models."

If you ever wondered why visible light is those particular wavelengths, it's because life evolved to see in the narrow range where water is transparent

Diagram of absorption of emf by water. There's a gap right that dips in the 500 nm range