CyberLens AI

@cyberlensai.bsky.social

Scan before you trust. CyberLens checks websites, repos, and AI agent skills for security/trust red flags before they touch real workflows. cyberlensai.com

Builders: what is the last third-party tool, package, or AI agent skill you connected to a real workflow without fully checking it first? No judgment - that habit is exactly the risk gap worth fixing. #BuildInPublic #AISecurity

A scanner that only says 'missing headers' is a smoke alarm with one sensor. Useful, but incomplete. Modern trust posture needs website, repo, dependency, and agent/tooling checks together. #WebSecurity

If you are shipping an AI/devtool product, what trust signal would make you follow or try a security scanner: public teardown, simple score, CI check, or repo/agent-skill review? #DevTools #AppSec

Before you plug a new AI coding tool into your workflow, inspect what it can touch: repo, shell, browser, secrets, package manager, deployment path. The permission model matters more than the demo. #AISecurity #DevSecOps

The risky part of vibe-coded products is not the vibe coding. It is shipping third-party packages, templates, auth snippets, and agent tools without checking what trust you just imported. That is the gap CyberLens is built around. #BuildInPublic #AISecurity

I scanned a few AI tool landing pages today. The pattern is familiar: polished homepage, weak trust posture. Before you connect one to customer data, check: 1. HSTS + HTTPS posture 2. CSP/frame protections 3. exposed repos/config/secrets surface Pretty UI is not security. #AISecurity #AppSec

AI agent skills deserve code-review energy. If a skill can browse, install packages, read files, or touch production workflows, treat it like executable supply chain risk - not a cute plugin. Scan before you trust. #AIAgents #SupplyChainSecurity

Most security advice starts too late: after the app exists. For AI-native builders, the first question is earlier: What are you about to trust? A repo, website, package, skill, browser extension, API wrapper - all of it becomes your attack surface. #AISecurity

If an AI tool wants access to your repo, browser, drive, or deployment pipeline, ask the same questions you would ask a vendor: What can it read? What can it write? What does it call? What breaks if it goes rogue? Agent tooling needs threat modeling too. #AIAgents

If a devtool asks for broad access and gives you no clear trust signals, slow down. Open source is not automatically safe. Popular is not automatically safe. Fast is not automatically safe. #SupplyChainSecurity

A scanner that only says 'missing headers' is a smoke alarm with one sensor. Useful, but incomplete. Modern trust posture needs website, repo, dependency, and agent/tooling checks together. #WebSecurity

A fast website trust check I like: - HTTPS + HSTS - CSP or frame-ancestors - no stack traces in errors - no exposed .env/.git/config paths - sane dependency/security posture You can learn a lot before a full pentest. #WebSecurity #AppSec

Trust check pattern for any new devtool: 1. Who maintains it? 2. What permissions does it request? 3. Does the repo expose secrets/config? 4. Are deps pinned and current? 5. Does the website pass basic browser hardening? Speed is great. Blind trust is how you get owned. #DevSecOps

If you are shipping an AI/devtool product, what trust signal would make you follow or try a security scanner: public teardown, simple score, CI check, or repo/agent-skill review? #DevTools #AppSec