In autism intervention research, influential studies are of such rock-bottom quality that those involved (with COIs) devised autism-specific low standards to accommodate the abysmal state of the literature. Of course, discarding & lowering standards this way harms autistics--it would harm anyone
Most systematic reviews and meta- analyses now include some assessment of study quality but these don't usually impact a review's conclusions. It's typically just some tick boxes or traffic lights and vague qualitative statements. We should instead filter out poor studies. What is wrong with us?