Brandon Bishop

@brandontbishop.bsky.social

Seismologist, investigates the Andes and subduction zones, currently complexly affiliated with St. Louis University and looking for new projects. Replies to my geoscience posts that include LLM content get your account blocked.

She basically found out from the new organizational charts that did not include her entire division, well before the letter that told her she was losing her job. This comes some months after a new chief took over the agency — a guy who until recently worked for Turning Point USA.

My sister was informed today that the career she's devoted 21 years of her life to at the National Resources Conservation Service (under the USDA) as an ecological site specialist is over, as they are dissolving her position.

My college’s HR is now requiring us to post a job ad to our internal site for any student hire. As in, I can’t just hire that RA I wanted, I’m supposed to vet a bunch of random applications.

Perhaps I’m not understanding how this works. But these are unimaginable sums. Let’s say Iran wants a 5% fee, the low end of the demand Trump is accepting. Approx. 20% of global oil production goes through the strait. So 5%, 20% … this means Iran takes a 1% cut off the top of the export …

Bill Grueskin@bgrueskin.bsky.social · 13h ago

Reuters: Iran wants fees of 5%-7% of the price of cargo from ships using the strait; Oman wants 3%. "Making fees voluntary, at least nominally, could be a way out of the impasse, although an implied threat of Iranian attacks could mean shippers would be ​unlikely to risk transit without paying."

quote cont. "...The epistemic requirements of scholarly inquiry may be fundamentally at odds with profit-driven, black-boxed systems whose training data, architecture, and governance remain inaccessible to most researchers."

I was never involved in something that complex, but a friend was awarded a $750k equipment grant by NSF. They ended up as PI because two others changed universities. The equipment is controlled by them, though there are other profs on the grant. In total they control $1m+ in equipment.

Oh, absolutely. And development offices don't want to raise funds for things like maintenance contracts, even though they are eating up a larger portion of budgets, left and right.

Repair costs for our analytical equipment has gotten out of hand as well. Just a preventative maintenance service for one instrument was some 20k. That eats up a significant amount of our total repair budget for just upkeep--not even "fixing" anything...

Don't get me wrong... I'm grateful for any of the support we can get, but to have a funding org ask me to do a 5yr project in 2yrs on half the budget is kinda... damn. The only way for that to happen is the scope of what can be done gets dramatically cut.

There is not an industry on planet earth that could have gone >2 decades without a cost of living adjustment and be healthy. But that is what science is like now. I just got notice that some of our service costs are going up ~9%. Microscopes are up >300% in price over the last 2 decades. etc...

I am... let us say ambivalent... about America taking a step back from international affairs due to a hypothetical reduction in US military expenditures. Those expenditures have mostly not been well used in for most of my lifetime.