Steve Liesman

@steveliesman.bsky.social

CNBC senior economics reporter. Husband, father, journalist, guitarist and fly fisherman. (The Lies-man joke has been made. It’s not fresh. It’s my father’s father’s name, bastardized at Ellis Island. Move along.)

The president’s threat to halt trade with countries with which we have a trade deficit is self-defeating, stupid, and a non sequitur. But it’s also serious. Self defeating because countries with trade deficits recycle dollars into treasuries and reduce US interest rates.

FWIW, I can see after the speech how this new Warsh communication regime can work for markets. He provides functions but not reaction, giving market enough info to create probabilities around possible reactions but promising nothing and getting a clearer signal on market probabilities.

Someone in the White House spent time today preparing an eo to rename Lake Ontario. The president spent time signing it. In economic terms, was the opportunity cost negative because they could have been doing something more important? Or positive, because they didn’t do something even dumber?

The fed could look thru tariffs as a one-off rise in the price level if they were one-off. Instead, they seem like they are daily. Might be six months or a year till we can measure the change to the 338 tariffs from ieepa. The new Canada tariffs may not later that much. Until they are raised again

Can’t recall reading such brutal commentary of a fed chairman as the street is laying on Warsh today. JPM’s Feroli: he “…once again failed to specify how he intended to achieve his stridently asserted inflation resolve” and failed to support pce as the target in the medium term.

Markets don’t a have a problem pricing in default risk. They just charge more for it. This is why all the deals President Trump strikes (and his successors) will be more expensive than they otherwise would be. When the president walks away from his own trade deal with Canada or rips up Obama’s…1/4

Pres Trump’s plan to charge for early access to his pronouncements on his truth social company should be illegal. The information he releases is not his personal property. It belongs to the people. He has no right to sell and profit from it.

The question for tomorrow’s Warsh hearing is whether Senators let him get away with saying nothing about his outlook for monetary policy. Is it enough for him just to repeat his commitment to the mandate? Will somebody make him respond to the question,

I think all this talk from Warsh about not providing forward guidance is a bit of hooey. He said inflation is too high. He made a firm commitment to price stability. He said that inflation from AI or other sources is the fed’s choice. What more do you need to know ? 1/