Elliot

@1t2ls.bsky.social

gym selfies and poetry 🏳️‍🌈 NYC #lunchpoems

“A picture held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language, and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably.” (Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, §115)

overall verdict: - his overall argument is good (changes in dominant media forms cause a change in public epistemology, and everything downstream of it) - after a while the book starts reading like pretty standard conservative culture wars grist. he’s extremely negative and biting, and it gets old.

Elliot@1t2ls.bsky.social · 5d ago

I’m a few chapters into this. So far pretty good. He does that thing people do with intellectual history where they play fast and loose with philosophers, but it’s ok. The core analytic point is somewhere between Wittgenstein and Levi-Strauss.

zoth Anniversary Edition
AMUSING OURSELVES TO DEATH
PUBLIC DISCOURSE IN THE AGE OF SHOW BUSINESS
NEIL POSTMAN
New Introduction by Andrew Postman

It's worth remembering that there's an entire industry of people in the US whose income and prestige depend on their ability to spew bullshit to the effect of "God says our group is good and everyone else is bad" at thousands of people every week. I say this as the son of an evangelical pastor.

many days on my return from my morning cardio i walk past the bit Opus Dei hq, and there’s often this older white guy in business clothes cleaning the sidewalk in front of the building. knowing opus dei this guy is probably being given this task as some sort of punishment.

one of the reviews of Opus 5 called it “neurotic”. best i can come up with: it’s like the kid in your class who is terrified of getting a bad grade but also kind of clueless and thinks they can compensate by talking a lot and doing tons of busy work to show how much they care.

Every week I buy a lottery ticket knowing with as much certainty as one can have about anything that I will not win, but knowing that someone else will. I call it a voluntary tax, and say that I’m paying for the option to have hope. Wouldn’t it be better to just subsidize groceries? Childcare? Etc.

USA TODAY Opinion@usatodayopinion.usatoday.com · 2d ago

Opinion: Mamdani's idea may sound appealing, but it's NYC taxpayers who will take the hit, subsidizing discounts they may never even use.