Adam Steinbaugh

@adamsteinbaugh.bsky.social

First Amendment attorney at FIRE. Opinions are my own.

Excellent coverage of the ongoing hearing in Trump's trollsuit against the Des Moines Reg and pollster Ann Selzer for whiffing a 2024 poll. Trump calls it a violation of the IA consumer fraud statute — a gross assault on the 1st Amendment. But also, any harm was to the campaign, not him personally.

Laura Belin@laurarbelin.bsky.social · 4w ago

Ostergren suggests that since a campaign is a legal representative of a candidate, campaign spending in response to this poll would be like an economic loss for the candidate. Judge wants to know if there's any case law on that; he's pretty certain there isn't. 72/

Why are N.J. courts taking so long to fix a First Amendment error against a local news site? A New Jersey judge took one day to silence New Brunswick Today's reporting on school security. Weeks later, the news site is still waiting for a hearing to challenge the unconstitutional order.

Why are N.J. courts taking so long to fix a First Amendment error against a local news site? | Opinion

Weeks after ordering New Brunswick Today to remove truthful school security footage, the court still hasn't heard the news site's First Amendment defense — allowing unconstitutional censorship to succ...

nj.com

Listen as a New Jersey judge orders a newspaper (New Brunswick Today) to delete a security video the school district wanted deleted from the internet -- and orders the newspaper not to write about it *at all.* This is a prior restraint in violation of the First Amendment.

Very frustrating how earnestly people seem to buy into the idea that forcing people to post under real names would fix anything. It wouldn't, and you'd be giving an immense gift to authoritarians as well as punishing people who have good reason—which may be none of your damn business—to post anon.

I realize I'm at broken record territory here but: The UK's under-16 ban will not be some magical band-aid on society but it will add to the growing heap of privacy and censorship issues in the UK (and elsewhere.) Whether you’re 15 or 55, your ability to speak freely and anonymously is at risk.

Rubio is claiming the authority to deport people based on their views alone. Today, a federal court will hear a lawsuit challenging that authority on First Amendment grounds:

Conor Fitzpatrick@ctfitzpatrick.bsky.social · 2mo ago

This morning, my @thefireorg.bsky.social team and I are in California federal court challenging the two immigration statutes Secretary Rubio is using to try to deport visa and green card holders for protected speech. Incredibly proud of this team and our brave clients.

I had a fantastic interview today with Larry and Leanne Bushart, fresh off his legal settlement with Perry County for locking him up for 37 days over a meme he posted on Facebook. You can see my exclusive report beginning Thursday morning on NewsChannel 5 - and at 4, 5 and 6 pm!

Bild

Civil rights lawsuits like this can play an important role in deterring unconstitutional assaults on free speech rights. But they only apply to state, not federal, government officials. We need federal and/or state legislation allowing victims of censorship by federal officials to recover damages.

Adam Steinbaugh@adamsteinbaugh.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Larry Bushart spent 37 *days* in jail for posting memes criticizing Trump and Charlie Kirk. His arrest was the crest of a wave of censorship after Kirk was killed. Now a Tennessee county will pay $835,000 to settle his First Amendment lawsuit, filed by FIRE. www.fire.org/news/victory...

The President, White House, and FCC's Brendan Carr are calling for action -- and implying a criminal investigation -- against CNN for... accurately reporting what Iran's state media shared as a statement from Iran's Supreme National Security Council.

Trump "Truth": The alleged Statement put out by CNN World News is a FRAUD, as CNN well knows. The false Statement was linked to a Fake News site (from Nigeria) and, of course, immediately picked up by CNN, and blared out as a “legitimate” headline. The Official Statement by Iran was just released, and posted on TRUTH, below. Authorities are looking to determine whether or not a crime was committed on the issuance of the Fake CNN World Statement, or was it a sick rogue player? CNN is being ordered to immediately withdraw this Statement with full apologies for their, as usual, terrible “reporting.” Results of the investigation will be announced in the near future. President DONALD J. TRUMPWhite House Rapid Response account: "ATTENTION 
@cnni
: As 
@POTUS
 just said, Iran’s official statement is linked in his TRUTH below AND posted by the Iranian foreign minister. This alleged statement by “Iran” is a FRAUD! Correct immediately!" [Photo of CNN story citing "a statement from Iran's Supreme National Security Council report by Iranian state media."Brendan Carr tweet: More outrageous conduct from CNN.

Fake news is bad enough for the country, but pushing out a hoax headline in such a sensitive national security moment as this requires accountability.

Iran put out an official statement that simply cannot be squared with the one CNN's false headline attributes to them.

Time for change at CNN.Iran's PressTV Twitter account:

Supreme national security council:

Iran achieved historic victory by forcing criminal US to accept its 10-point plan.