adewale.bsky.social

@adewale.bsky.social

A

Interesting new pattern I'm seeing in multiple places: - Person has brilliant idea. - They use AI to write it up. - The write-up now contains so much indirection and so many AI tics that the only way to understand it is to talk directly to the person. - ???

If your method of building smarter models quickly involves accidental hacks with growing and hard-to-detect external damage, then that may not be the ideal strategy to prevent accidental hacks with growing and hard-to-detect external damage.

A

If you don't read the code then you'll have to find or create some other abstraction/notation that gives you legibility into the system and lets you change/guide the system. What will those things be?

Great article relevant to bill C-22 debates in Canada. The argument that backdoors only weaken your *own* systems because adversaries are likely to use someone else’s systems is even more relevant in Canada than in the US, simply because we’re smaller and most systems come from elsewhere.

Matthew Green@matthewdgreen.bsky.social · last mo.

I wrote up a new post about what AI software finding might mean for the backdoor debate. blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2026/08/14/e...

Great lens. I often think of Gregory Bateson’s notion of “making circuit”. You want the important feedback loops to make circuit through you, or else it’s no longer your OODA loop.

I think this is a big gap in software design culture. There's lots of commentary on visual design and micro-interaction, but remarkably little explicating conceptual and structural design. This section from Magic Ink is lodged in my mind. buff.ly/Bl9JwTv

Bild
A

Theory: it's not a "dark forest." We're just blind. If that's true then as we develop the tools and intellectual capabilities to 'see', the universe will come to seem like a rainforest teeming with life.

A