Aliza Hochman Bloom

@ahochmanbloom.bsky.social

Law Professor at @NUSL | Crim Pro / Crim / Fourth Amendment / Sentencing Reform | Alum Federal Public Defender (Appeals)

Grateful that "Suspicion by Association" was just published by the Arizona Law Review. I present contexts where police rely on the behavior of a person's companions to justify interventions, and argue this is antithetical to Fourth Amendment doctrine. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Suspicion by Association

<p>The constitutional requirement that police have individualized suspicion before a stop, search, or arrest was an essential limitation on the state’s power. I

papers.ssrn.com

Thanks to @ssrn.bsky.social for highlighting my essay, out in the Stanford Law Review Online. I argue that changing landscape about the suspiciousness of carrying a gun lends to overreliance on associational suspicion when justifying police interventions.

SSRN@ssrn.bsky.social · 5mo ago

This article critiques the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in #UnitedStates v. Wilson that gun possession alone doesn’t justify a stop but upheld it due to defendant’s associations & arrest history. Read: spkl.io/63321AFGF1 Subscribe: spkl.io/63323AFGFH @nusl.bsky.social

This image shows the logo for Northeastern University School of Law.

Officers stop car w/man & his girlfriend. They arrest him. Having reasonable suspicion there's a gun in the car, they conduct a sweep of the car & find the gun before letting her return to it. CA10, 2-1: Sweep violated the 4A, as there was no reason to think she was dangerous.

Bild

My recent article, “Known to Police: the Revival of Juvenile Curfews”, is forthcoming in Volume 62 of the Wake Forest Law Review. It examines the Fourth Amendment and carceral implications of resurgent juvenile curfews. Feedback is welcome! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Known to Police: the Revival of Juvenile Curfews

A few years ago, in response to an uptick in crime rates, many cities revived a familiar tool-juvenile curfews. Yet unlike prior iter

papers.ssrn.com

I'm so grateful to the excellent editors at @stanlrev.bsky.social for quickly publishing this essay on an important tension in Fourth Amendment law.

Stanford Law Review@stanlrev.bsky.social · 9mo ago

Expanding public-carry regimes challenge Terry’s reasonable-suspicion standard. In some states, suspected gun possession alone can’t justify stops. @ahochmanbloom.bsky.social warns an emerging “firearm exceptionalism” sustains racialized, hindsight-based policing.

It is gratifying to see people rely on my work in practice and to be cited alongside scholars whose work I deeply admire.

Northeastern Law@nusl.bsky.social · 12mo ago

An opinion released by the D.C. Court of Appeals cites @ahochmanbloom.bsky.social’s recent Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties article on why courts must account for race in their Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. #NUSLPride law.northeastern.edu/hochman-bloo...

"Suspicion by Association" explores four troubling policing contexts in which individuals become the subject of criminal suspicion based on the company they keep. It's forthcoming in Arizona Law Review, and I welcome all feedback. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

SUSPICION BY ASSOCIATION

The constitutional requirement that police have individualized suspicion prior to a stop, search or arrest was an essential limitation on the state's power. It

papers.ssrn.com

Appreciate ABC7 giving me and my UChicago Fed Crim Justice Clinic the chance to highlight an example of the judiciary having the courage to do what the law requires and be the bulwark against incursions on our constitutional & statutorily protected rights & liberties

UChicago Law@uchicagolaw.bsky.social · 2y ago

“This man has to be released unless the prosecutor can actually prove that there is a, quote, ‘serious risk’ that he will flee the jurisdiction if he's released and they would need to prove that by what we call a preponderance of the evidence,” Clinical Prof. @alisonsiegler.bsky.social told ABC7.

Thank you, @inquest.bsky.social, for publishing this short essay on the disappointing outcome in Comm. v. Gelin, and the urgent need to rethink policing realities and constitutional protection for those serving community supervision.

Inquest@inquest.bsky.social · 2y ago

The right to be free from unreasonable government intrusion means nothing to the millions subject to probation—by far the most common form of criminal punishment in the United States, writes @ahochmanbloom.bsky.social. Just because it's "not prison" is not a reason to give this practice a pass.