𝒜ℒ

@alanlundgard.bsky.social

Inter- art design tech research @ Stanford digital archive www.alanlundgard.com 📍NYC

Using AI to create visual artifacts indistinguishable from traditional media aesthetics really misses its potential. I don’t want to see more of the same, more quickly. I want to see things I’ve never seen before

Technically impressive yes but I know of very few young people who think AI is “cool” in the rock n’ roll sense which seems bad for a new tech attempting to intervene in every aspect of culture

People on social media work themselves into rigid anti-AI (or pro-AI) positions, making it hard to publicly admit to any benefits (or harms) I don’t think this matches peoples’ actual AI use which is somewhere between total refusal and enthusiastic adoption

Not anti AI art but I will say I can easily enter a 4+ hour flow state while painting that would never happen working with AI tools The roulette aspect of prompting (which is part of its gambling-like appeal) frustrates each gesture from building toward a cohesive whole

I like this 1980s Kim Gordon quote to partly explain why AI wont supplant human art: “People pay to see others believe in themselves” Already seeing increased cultural cachet of handmade over automatic. An expression of “faith in ourselves,” as Miyazaki put it after the AI demo