Alexandrova Lab

@alexandrovalab.bsky.social

A group of computational chemists at UCLA. We study catalysts, materials, and complex (bio)molecular systems (and make them better!). Student-run account. https://alexandrova.chem.ucla.edu/

🧩 Every element plays its part in enabling selective nonoxidative coupling of methane on atomically dispersed Ti-Al-B nanopowder! Check out our collaborative effort in @jacs.acspublications.org: 👉 doi.org/10.1021/jacs... #compchem #chemsky #compchemsky @uclacb.bsky.social @berkeleylab.lbl.gov

Low-Temperature Non-Oxidative Coupling of Methane on Atomically Dispersed Titanium–Aluminum–Boron Nanopowder

Nonoxidative coupling of methane represents a long-standing challenge in heterogeneous catalysis, as it requires activation of the carbon–hydrogen (C–H) bond, controlled carbon–carbon (C–C) bond formation, and effective hydrogen management without relying on oxidants. Here, we report a low-temperature C–H activation and nonoxidative C–C coupling of methane over atomically dispersed titanium–aluminum–boron nanopowder (Ti–Al–B NP) utilizing a catalytic microreactor coupled to synchrotron single-photon photoionization reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The soft-ionization, in situ probing method detects the nascent reaction products and radical intermediates under operando conditions, including methyl radical, C2 hydrocarbons, and molecular hydrogen. Methane activation is initiated at 800 K, approximately 700 K below the gas-phase decomposition threshold, leading predominantly to ethylene formation with selectivity reaching up to 78% among the C–C coupled products. Electronic structure calculations on model Ti–Al–B clusters elucidate a cooperative catalytic mechanism in which titanium enables methane adsorption and C–H activation, boron acts as a reversible hydrogen reservoir, and aluminum stabilizes methylene intermediates, thereby facilitating selective C–C coupling and dehydrogenation. These findings establish a distinct catalyst architecture for nonoxidative methane coupling based on earth abundant elements alternative to expensive platinum and other noble metal-containing conventional catalysts and provide molecular-level design principles for controlling dehydrogenation and subsequent C–C bond formation in challenging light alkane conversions.

doi.org

Ni-SACs are great at reactive carbon capture, too! For more on details of the electrochemical interface that drive selectivity, check out our new theory+experiment paper in @jacs.acspublications.org 👉 doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c11791 #compchem #chemsky #compchemsky @uclacb.bsky.social

Solution and Active Site Speciation Drive Selectivity for Electrocatalytic Reactive Carbon Capture in Diethanolamine over Ni–N–C Catalysts

Direct conversion of captured forms of carbon, or reactive carbon capture (RCC), presents an opportunity to reduce the energy intensity and cost of direct CO2 utilization from dilute sources. While amine-based sorbents effectively capture CO2, their use for RCC presents numerous challenges with typical pure metal catalysts used for electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2R). Here, using both theory and experiments, we find that Ni–N–C single atom catalysts are effective for RCC conversion to CO using a diethanolamine sorbent, in contrast to pure metal catalysts. Computational analysis reveals that RCC can proceed directly through direct reduction of the sorbent-CO2 adduct or indirectly by C–N bond breaking facilitating CO2 adsorption and subsequent reduction. We find that the latter mechanism is most prevalent at low overpotentials where we experimentally observe RCC selectivity. We also find experimentally that the rate of CO production for RCC with Ni–N–C catalysts can exceed pure bicarbonate solutions at intermediate sorbent concentration (0.1–0.5 M DEA) under dilute (10–25%) streams of CO2 at low overpotentials. The coordination environment of Ni sites and the solution speciation influence their RCC activity, with changes in protonation to coordinating N/C atoms resulting in changing the RCC mechanism and consequent activity. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and computational analysis reveal restructuring under RCC conditions due to hydrogen coadsorption with DEA that limits the stability of Ni–N–C catalysts. This work highlights the importance of carefully controlling the catalyst and solution environment to achieve active and stable RCC electrocatalysis.

doi.org

Alexandrova Lab@alexandrovalab.bsky.social · 10mo ago

Wondering what the true active sites for Ni-SACs look like during CO₂ reduction? Take a look at our new paper in @jacs.acspublications.org 👉 doi.org/10.1021/jacs... #compchem #chemsky #compchemsky

How do surface hydroxyls enable Cu restructuring during CO electroreduction? Check out this new paper in @jacs.acspublications.org! 👉 doi.org/10.1021/jacs... #compchem #chemsky #compchemsky

Role of Surface Hydroxyls in Atomic-Scale Copper Restructuring during CO Electroreduction

The nanoscale structure of electrocatalyst surfaces governs the selectivity and kinetics of reactions including CO(2) electroreduction (CO(2)R). Yet, their evolution under reaction conditions remains elusive, and the roles of surface hydroxyls (OHad) and the interfacial microenvironment in surface restructuring are poorly understood. Combining electrochemical atomic force microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and grand canonical modeling, we reveal that OHad acts synergistically with COad to restructure copper (Cu) electrocatalysts during COR. Mixed OHad/COad coverage promotes lifting of surface atoms into metastable states, generating Cu adatoms and nanoclusters at mild cathodic potentials, which aggregate or dissolve at more negative potentials. This restructuring into low-coordinated Cu sites is accompanied by disordering of the interfacial water network. Nanocluster stability depends critically on CO partial pressure, while hydroxyls remain kinetically trapped on the roughened Cu surface. These findings underscore the importance of surface kinetics and interfacial microenvironments in atomic-scale surface restructuring, urging a reassessment of catalytic surface states under realistic conditions.

doi.org

Check out our new study on the Role of Surface Hydroxyls in Atomic-Scale Copper Restructuring during CO Electroreduction, out in @jacs.acspublications.org! 👉 doi.org/10.1021/jacs... #chemsky #compchem #compchemsky

Role of Surface Hydroxyls in Atomic-Scale Copper Restructuring during CO Electroreduction

The nanoscale structure of electrocatalyst surfaces governs the selectivity and kinetics of reactions including CO(2) electroreduction (CO(2)R). Yet, their evolution under reaction conditions remains elusive, and the roles of surface hydroxyls (OHad) and the interfacial microenvironment in surface restructuring are poorly understood. Combining electrochemical atomic force microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and grand canonical modeling, we reveal that OHad acts synergistically with COad to restructure copper (Cu) electrocatalysts during COR. Mixed OHad/COad coverage promotes lifting of surface atoms into metastable states, generating Cu adatoms and nanoclusters at mild cathodic potentials, which aggregate or dissolve at more negative potentials. This restructuring into low-coordinated Cu sites is accompanied by disordering of the interfacial water network. Nanocluster stability depends critically on CO partial pressure, while hydroxyls remain kinetically trapped on the roughened Cu surface. These findings underscore the importance of surface kinetics and interfacial microenvironments in atomic-scale surface restructuring, urging a reassessment of catalytic surface states under realistic conditions.

doi.org