Alex Becker

@alexcbecker.net

Safeguards @ Anthropic, but anything posted here is my personal view San Francisco Blog: https://alexcbecker.net/blog.html

Actually, it would be very interesting to get a group of smart non-mathematicians together with an LLM and a library of literature on some long-abandoned mathematical program and see how well they could revitalize it

Bild

Trying to formulate a consistent version the anti-stancilist view. I think such people believe the economy is bad in an absolute sense and hence increased sentiment to that effect is an improvement. And they’re anti-incrementalists so not giving credit for improvement is also good.

(I suppose it's just like how when I read some fancy math I don't really understand I basically understand it as evil demonology) ((Of course anyone who doesn't understand the fancy math *I* understand is ignorant))

a funny challenge to the seething hive of morons in the replies below would be 1. define you think "economics" means in one sentence and 2. write down any 5 beliefs that more than half of academic economists agree with on published polls of those economists. "pick up a pencil and draw a bike"

oliver@eikopf.com · 2w ago

very tired of pretending that dismissing modern economics is somehow more reasonable than dismissing vaccines. if you’re not an expert, you don’t get to pick and choose parts of a field to believe! you have no way to tell between legitimate and illegitimate results in that field!

Notable that the 3 biggest AI math results have been along lines that were not expected to be productive (2 disproofs of conjectures widely thought true, 1 finicky linear algebra argument not thought powerful enough). Primarily exploiting the cost of AI labor relative to skilled mathematicians.

prompt injection risk is so annoying man we could do so much cool automation if this wasn't a problem