Andrey Baklitskiy

@baklitskiy.bsky.social

Nukes at UNIDIR. Views own, RT/❤️ ≠ endorsement

Russian President Putin commented for the first time on the Ukrainian strike campaign against Russian industry and infrastructure, saying that “such attacks have no critical consequences; they have not had any, and they cannot have any. But, of course, they do cause us harm”

I didn’t know Tucker Carlson was anti-nukes: “Nuclear weapons are demonic, there’s no upside to them at all, & anyone who claims otherwise is either ignorant or doing the bidding of the forces that created nuclear technology, which were not human forces obviously” www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024...

Tucker Carlson credits demons for the invention of nuclear technology

Ex-Fox News host makes bizarre claim on Steve Bannon’s podcast, days after saying a demon attacked him in his sleep

theguardian.com

So China again sent notifications ahead of its SLBM launch and even sent them to more regional countries than in 2024, including Japan and Papua New Guinea. But while it received quite a bit of recognition for doing so in 2024, that doesn't seem to be the case this time around?

I participated in the NPT review process for the first time in 2013. There has not been a single agreed Final Document since then. When the next RevCon starts in 2031, it will have been 21 years since states parties last reached consensus.

The fifth draft of the NPT final document is even shorter. Gone: paragraphs on nuclear sharing/extended deterrence, DPRK/Korean Peninsula, Zaporizhzhia NPP. Iran compliance paragraph bracketed (no consensus), language on reporting weakened

Andrey Baklitskiy@baklitskiy.bsky.social · 4mo ago

The fourth draft of the NPT final document is significantly shorter: 8 pages instead of 13, with 7 preambular and 45 operative paragraphs instead of 19 and 93. A lot of things are gone.

I really like the Russian-Chinese Joint Declaration on the Emergence of a Multipolar World and International Relations of a New Type adopted today. Just read some of the points 🧵: "All states and their associations are free to choose their foreign partners and models of international cooperation."

Late in 2025 I saw a presentation on philanthropic contributions to various issues, which gave the following numbers for these issues: $10B — climate change $900M — AI safety $200M — biological threats $45M — nuclear security To just give a sense of orders of magnitudes...

The third draft of the NPT final document continues the trend of becoming less controversial and demanding, mostly losing parts of the text, including some added in Rev2. The only increase is on the side of peaceful uses, and some language on attacks against nuclear facilities 🧵

Just realized that next month Gen. Sergey Karakayev will mark 16 years as commander of Russian Strategic Rocket Forces, a record for both Russia and USSR. This is quite different from most other Russian services/ branches, which have seen significant turnover in recent years

P3 Joint Statement to the NPT RevCon encourages states to adopt concrete risk reduction measures, such as launch notifications and CBMs on nuclear testing and zero-yield. That's it, those are the measures.

Great contribution to the field from my colleague Sarah Ruth Opatowski. The compendium maps and analyzes a decade of nuclear risk reduction proposals across the NPT review process, First Committee, and other multilateral forums. Learn more at our side event at the RevCon on May 6, CR8

United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research@unidir.org · 5mo ago

☢️ As the Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference starts next week, UNIDIR’s latest compendium maps a decade of proposals and over 100 official documents on nuclear risk reduction, drawing out similarities, differences and potential paths forward. 🔗 Read it here: unidir.org/CompendiumNRR