Banach Space Program

@banachspaceprogram.bsky.social

"I stand on you. Now we make sexytimes?" - @applecores.bsky.social "[T]hat pause between pitch and contact - longer than logic, shorter than hope" -Colin Sheridan #GuardiWins2026

This is intentionally antagonistic framing, that ignores the tilted field in favor of the largest markets, and the Dodgers having additional benefits nobody else has($200 million/year unshared TV revenue, for example). The system is broken, AND a cap is bad. Both are true, they're not opposites.

Jason Fry@jasoncfry.bsky.social · 3d ago

Those of you eager to serve wealthy MLB owners as volunteer Pinkertons won’t like to read this, but as usual Joe Sheehan nails the real problem:

Joe Sheehan: This trade is a microcosm of the real problem MLB has faced for decades. It’s not about haves and have-nots, but wants and want-nots. The Dodgers, and teams like them, want to win more than teams like the Tigers do, so they go out and acquire the Tigers’ best pitcher. MLB has built an entire labor strategy and media campaign around demonizing the Dodgers, when in fact it’s the Tigers who are wrecking baseball. You have to be through the looking glass to think the sport’s problem is the team that’s trying to win rather than the team that’s trading Tarik Skubal while sitting 2 1/2 games out of a playoff spot.

Lemon's cousin's daughter is at a conference at OSU this week, and I'm picking her up so we can take her to dinner. Realization hit me: I no longer look "too old, creepy" to pick up a woman on campus; I now look "dad picking up his daughter".

This is, frankly, bullshit, he says while watching the Guardians It isn't the spending money that makes the Dodgers the bad guys, it is the "getting $400 million in TV revenue, be sharing as if it is $80 million" that is the issue.

Razzball@razzball.bsky.social · last wk.

"small market teams" are run like ponzi schemes. they make no effort to get better, pocket $100 millions in revenue-sharing, cry poor for a decade or more then sell their franchise for an insane profit. Dodgers spending money are not the bad guys.

I know you want me to say that the two processes yield equivalent results, Directory. But, when you run a 2-sample t-test on THE DATA WE'RE SHARING, we get a resulting p-value of 0.00014. And the result is in our favor - we have strong statistical evidence that the value is lower, which we want!

Yes, change the process at the same time as you change the software, don't bother testing them, separately or together, and then dump all that shit on my lap once you've fucked it up. Thanks. Did they even bother to ask me, since I know about this process? Reader, you know the answer.