Paul Bays

@bayslab.org

Computational cognitive scientist, Professor at University of Cambridge.

Out now in NHB (finally!), a review of visual working memory from a computational perspective, with @weijima01 @timothyfbrady and Sebastian Schneegans.

The size-weight illusion is a by-product of efficient sensory coding adapted to the combinations of volume and mass found in everyday objects. New preprint

We measured how effectively observers can reallocate working memory resources to new visual items when old ones become obsolete - people are surprisingly good at it! New paper with @ivntmc @dataforyounz @DAagtenMurphy

New work with Jess McMaster & others: we show swap errors (item confusions) in cued recall are not a strategic response to forgotten items, but instead occur at exactly the rate predicted by variability in recall of the cue features

New in Psych Review with Sebastian Schneegans & Jess McMaster: comparing the roles of time and space in binding features in working memory

We have an opening for a post-doc (or potentially a talented graduate RA) to research computational mechanisms of visual perception/memory using online and offline experiments - note deadline 11 Aug

Views of an object before and after a saccade may be combined even if you are aware the object has changed - new with Garry Kong, @DAagtenMurphy and Jess McMaster.

New in JOV: the ability to combine visual evidence across gaze fixations depends on a limited but flexible memory resource

New paper on the consequences of stroke for recall precision and binding in visual WM, a collaboration with Roy Kessels and colleagues at the Donders (@DondersInst)

Our new Analogue Report Toolbox can be downloaded at . It implements in MATLAB a range of methods we use in the Bays lab for analyzing and modelling behavioural responses on VWM recall tasks, including...

Our new PNAS paper reveals how the main competing models of working memory limits can all be interpreted in terms of sampling. A number of surprises, including that item limits don't require discrete representations.

New with @robthedatafiend in Psych Review: for every visual feature dimension there is a consistent upper bound on the "s.d." you can obtain by fitting errors with a normal+uniform mixture...and it just might be telling us something about neural tuning!

A short note on BioRxiv on the relationship between the psychophysical scaling account of working memory by @timothyfbrady @markSchurgin and population coding models of the same:

Asymmetric competition in visual working memory: storing orientations doesn't affect memory for facial expressions, but storing expressions degrades orientation recall - new paper with Viljami Salmela on WM at different levels of the visual hierarchy:

An independent store in working memory for the locations of visual objects in relation to one another: provides a separate source of information for recalling locations and doesn't tap absolute (egocentric) WM resources - work with @DAagtenMurphy: PDF here

A Journal of Neuroscience "journal club" about our work on drift in working memory representations, by Ben Cuthbert & Dominic Standage

Another postdoc opening in @BaysLab: we're looking for someone with background in experimental study of eye movements to investigate visual evidence accumulation across gaze fixations. Apply here:

New paper in PLOS Comp Biol reveals how the sensory strength of a stimulus to be remembered determines how much space it takes up in working memory (corrected link)