Brian Mills

@bmmillsy.bsky.social

Associate Professor, University of Texas at Austin https://sites.google.com/utexas.edu/bmmillsphd

Dodgers traded Zyhir Hope and his 291/368/525 line. In the upper minors they still have: Tibbs 294/416/543 Ehrhard 293/405/478 (37 SB last year) Sirota 320/471/560 De Paula 317/417/562 George 329/419/396 (36 SB this year) And low minors: Shelton 303/403/657 Morales 292/377/537 Davalan 292/410/525

Dodgers have a treasure trove of prospects thanks to their development, supposedly what the efficient small market teams are good at. [Dodgers trade for top pitcher with prospects, will have to pay him the salary ~mediocre reliever Jose Leclerc] Every Idiot: SEE THIS IS WHY WE NEED A CAP!

Can't imagine a worse use of time than requiring me to track down the month of all 130 or so presentations I've given in my career to put on a CV for T&P. Who are the people parsing what month these things happened in? Who hurt them? Do they need their mommy?

Previously, my highest yearly review requests was 39 (1st Round + Revision). On pace for 51 this year. That's 1 per week. If I decline your invitation please don't be offended. There are like 5 journals I will not likely ever decline - you know who you are. Stop writing so many papers, people.

Rafael Devers is in decline, sure. But since the start of May he's slugged .564 with an ISO north of .300 despite playing home games in San Francisco as a LHB. Seems to still have some juice left to me.

Hard to know what this means for peak. But top guys currently pitching into their 40s (Scherzer, Verlander) have lost only 1 or 2 ticks from their peak. Kershaw down more than 5 ticks by 37. So let's say Randy lost 5 full mph by 2008. Then his peak was still ~4 mph slower than 2026 Misiorowski.

Mike Petriello@mikepetriello.bsky.social · last wk.

One of the fun things about a handful of 80s/90s star pitchers throwing so long is that we do actually have data from start of pitch tracking era in 2008, so on the same scale as Statcast. 2008 fastball velo. Obv they were in their 40s here, so not at peak. baseballsavant.mlb.com/statcast_sea...

Trying to find an issue with a very complex merge from a couple years ago - that I thought went fine - related to name merging. First comment in the (very large) R file is: ###need to add names from other file but fcks up the merge - FIGURE IT OUT FRIDAY So, I must have forgotten that Friday...

Filename naming convention for tenure & promotion at Texas is that they are not allowed to include candidate names in the filename. All candidates across the university have to submit the same (~40) files and filenames (not including copies of every paper). I'm sure this plan is totally foolproof.

So universities are now asking each co-author to provide letters stating contributions of each person to projects for promotion? Thousands upon thousands of unnecessary hours you’re throwing onto people? Is this an outgrowth of all the gift authorship bullshit I’ve watched grow the last 15 years?

Good news for sports econ people looking for travel funds. NAASE is now offering travel grants for first time presenters at NAASE-organized sessions at the Southerns, Easterns, and Westerns.

Bild

Every single T&P document is basically some variant of "please explain - in excruciating detail using 4 pages of text - the obvious reason for that weird blip easily seen in this chart."

Bild