Bridget O’Brien

@bridgetemob.bsky.social

Philadelphian, Chicagoan, Catholic lay minister • she | her “And having answered so I turn once more to those who sneer at this my city, and I give them back the sneer and say to them:”

The "saying" at the start of the quoted paragraph seems to just be a quote from a 2020 book written by an "alpha coach" and supplement salesman and I'm going to go out on a limb and make the bold claim that Simone de Beauvoir is more worthy of engaging on the topic of gender than that dude.

Stephen@stephenwaldron.bsky.social · yesterday

I was giving this progressive defense of "masculinity" a chance, but now that I've gotten to the part that explicitly says that men should disregard what lesbians think of them... That's just misogyny. It's almost a definition of misogyny.

Text about masculinity saying that being a man consists in being "recognized" as a man by "other men and straight women."

Me: Hi hello I need to buy a large number of gift cards. Store manger: We have a limit of X / day which cannot be overridden. Me: Can I buy them online? SM: No. Me: I work for a church; these are for families we accompany. Is there any way for me to buy Y gift cards by next week?

I am often curious about the percentage of people active in Christian Bluesky whose spiritual autobiographies include some major conversion experience—be that being “born again,” formally converting, or being received into a church as an adult—vs average churchgoers.

Ian is the Priest-King of the Sacred Grove at Nemi@poetinbabylon.bsky.social · 2d ago

playing around with this and I think they’re using “born again” / “not born again” to get around the fact that evangelicals don’t always self identify as evangelicals — but me and so many of my friends *are* in fact “born again” Mainliners???

More Thoughts On Scripture Reflections generated by my Monday email backlog: I have said it before; I will say it again: DO NOT START REFLECTIONS OR SERMONS OR HOMILIES BY TALKING ABOUT YOUR WRITING PROCESS. I don't care!! I do not care. In no way does it open up the Word. Save it for your diary!

Bridget O’Brien@bridgetemob.bsky.social · 2d ago

Checking my work email on Monday means clicking through a half-dozen reflections on yesterday's Mass readings from various Catholic email subscriptions and I just do not understand the iron-tight hold "the REAL miracle was everyone sharing the food they'd brought" has on people.

Checking my work email on Monday means clicking through a half-dozen reflections on yesterday's Mass readings from various Catholic email subscriptions and I just do not understand the iron-tight hold "the REAL miracle was everyone sharing the food they'd brought" has on people.

There are some foods that make my cat lose ALL control—he will fight me (literally) tooth and nail for them—and the most frustrating experience in the world is giving him a little piece and finding he is TOTALLY uninterested in what I have provided, for only the full serving I eat will do.

I have made myself very sad by reading something, and so I will box up all of my emotions and tape the box heavily and put the box on a shelf in a cupboard I never plan to open again; surely this will work.

I am not an MCU hater—they’re not high art, but I like a popcorn flick, what can I say—and I enjoyed Spider Man but, woooof, you really do have to watch & remember too much, and it is Annoying. “Wow, I don’t remember Frank at all.” Oh that’s bc he’s from a TV show I never watched.

Just read a transcript of a Fresh Air interview with the author of a book about the Catholic Church, and, man. It truly is remarkable just how low the bar can be for "accurate facts about the subject of your book."

Does the language of "non-negotiables" have a life in Catholic theology outside the context of US politics? BXVI used "These values are not negotiable" (Sacramentum Caritatis), which is connected but not identical.

Footnotes need not be merely useful informative and elaborative references, they can also be carefully placed sacramental signs of the deeper places where the noted discussion actually comes from. Or did I only imagine this, possibly after too much coffee?

I FULLY recognize that I am not a normal person; I am the outlier here—but one of the things I truly do not understand about gen AI use for writing is that I truly love re-reading something I have written, and I cannot imagine robbing myself of that pleasure.

I don’t want to do a whole “everyone process their feelings about covid on main” thing (it’s not healthy for me!), but the height of the pandemic was a time I was very conscious of distance from my able-to-work-remotely friends on the left.

I went off slightly in this week's bulletin reflection about "not counting women and children," but also, I didn't want to talk JUST about that and my word limit is 520, so... we'll see how what I did lands.

Bild