Brighton & Hove Seacheck

@brightonsea.bsky.social

Citizen Science - Brighton & Hove sea swimmers, fishing folk and others campaigning to end sewage pollution and monitor sea water quality. Plse join us!

Three results are in (samples 14th January 2026): 1️⃣ Sea Lanes = 299 cfu / 100mL E.coli 2️⃣ Brighton Palace Pier, east side = 137 cfu / 100mL E.coli 3️⃣ King Alfred SRO, Hove ≤ 12 cfu / 100mL E.coli EA rates results ≤ 250 cfu / 100mL E.coli as ‘Excellent.’

🌊 Three results are in (samples 16th December 2025): 1️⃣ Sea Lanes ≤ 12 cfu / 100mL E.coli 2️⃣ Brighton Palace Pier, east side = 390 cfu / 100mL E.coli 3️⃣ King Alfred SRO, Hove = 63 cfu / 100mL E.coli EA rates results ≤ 250 cfu / 100mL E.coli as ‘Excellent.’

Post 18 Nov 2025: 🌊 Three results are in (samples 17th November 2025): 1️⃣ Sea Lanes ≤ 11 cfu / 100mL E.coli 2️⃣ Brighton Palace Pier, east side = 652 cfu / 100mL E.coli 3️⃣ King Alfred SRO, Hove = 119 cfu / 100mL E.coli EA rates results ≤ 250 cfu / 100mL E.coli as ‘Excellent.’

Southern Water’s alert about Hove was clarified, “Our team have reviewed the storm overflow release event 1333704 from SHOREHAM NO1 and have confirmed it as a false alarm.” There was a genuine release on 20 Oct, for 4h33 Shoreham Beach was impacted on 23 Oct for 57 minutes with an outfall at No1.

25 Oct 25: 🌊 Results are in from three samples collected yesterday Brighton Palace Pier, east side = 384 cfu / 100mL E.coli Rottingdean = 137 cfu / 100mL E.coli Saltdean = 203 cfu / 100mL E.coli EA rates results ≤ 250 cfu / 100mL E.coli as ‘Excellent’ and ≤ 500 cfu / 100mL E.coli as ‘Good.’