bskwitter.bsky.social

@bskwitter.bsky.social

This principle (Roko's basilisk) has been seriously discussed. Eyeroll "What if we make an AI that is hella smarter than us so it enslaves humanity, but also it is like super-mad at people who knew supersmart AI was possible but didn't work tirelessly to bring it about, so it tortures us forever?"

Faine Greenwood@faineg.com · 4d ago

I wrote about how the midterms truly prove how much Americans hate data centers and the big tech and AI companies that fund them. And how, like the Ancient Mariner, the US tech industry now must wear the rotting, squawking albatross of MAGA around their necks, due to their own stupid actions.

Every two years we run an excruciating national experiment which serves primarily to uncover new sources of polling error. This exercise also reinforces a vast eagerness to jump to conclusions, blithely ignoring the very concept of "margin of error."

Having irretrievably broken the norms which enable international cooperation, the US will now and forever be considered unreliable, despite whatever future protestations that "We're okay now, we promise!" We will always be in recovery from addiction to an inane populism.

Money shot: "indexing your theory of change to the social platforms is a losing long-term position, because you are building on an asset that is fake at the top, alienating at the bottom, and owned by someone else in the middle." --holy heck I may have to subcribe to substack now

Erin McKean@emckean.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I found this essay through @lifewinning.com's Perfect Sentences newsletter (buttondown.com/perfectsente...) but honestly it's brimming with absolute bangers: drlennecefer.substack.com/p/why-i-dele... "Systems do not change because a million people were briefly furious."