Tessera
Folgen

Catincognito skeeting since 07/3/2023

@catincognito.bsky.social

MY DM'S ARE OFF⬅️⬅️⬅️ 🚨⚠️I CAN SPOT A BOT A MILE AWAY🚨⚠️ Gigi my Cat,lover😻 Resisting HATE AND MAGA NEVER TRUMPER IT'S TIME LIKE THESE YOU LEARN TO LIVE AGAIN..FOO FIGHTERS Rocky Mountain High ♥️Ukraine 🇺🇦 MEMBER # 243,424 #leguminati🫘

27199 Posts28256 Follower26187 Folgt
Niall Harbison@niallharbison.bsky.social · 5h ago

A hard situation deep into the Thai Jungle today after we got a tip off. Nobody lives here. Managed to get the first boy saved (more soon we hope) and medical care. I've never seen a dog go from scared to happy to be rescued so quick

Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 8h ago

ICYMI last night, DHS is currently being fined every day for contempt of court until it coughs up the cell phone records of officers involved in immigration stops in L.A. last year that looked like racial profiling rather than reasonable cause. short thread -->

Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 18h ago

Fed. judge holds DHS in civil contempt of court for refusing "intentionally and not in good faith" to provide plaintiffs with phone images they intend to use to prove DHS was racially profiling people arrested in Los Angeles without reasonable suspicion. Order from July 28, unsealed today.

B. Defendants’ Noncompliance Is Intentional And Not In Good Faith. Having found that Defendants are in violation of the January 16 Forensic Imaging Order, the burden now shifts to Defendants to show that they were unable to comply. Affordable Media, 179 F.3d at 1239 (9th Cir. 1999). They fail to make that showing. Upon review of the parties’ submissions and counsel’s representations at the hearing, it does not appear that Defendants’ noncompliance is due to an inability to comply. Instead, the clear and convincing evidence shows that Defendants have acted intentionally and not in good faith.
Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 18h ago

Fed. judge holds DHS in civil contempt of court for refusing "intentionally and not in good faith" to provide plaintiffs with phone images they intend to use to prove DHS was racially profiling people arrested in Los Angeles without reasonable suspicion. Order from July 28, unsealed today.

B. Defendants’ Noncompliance Is Intentional And Not In Good Faith. Having found that Defendants are in violation of the January 16 Forensic Imaging Order, the burden now shifts to Defendants to show that they were unable to comply. Affordable Media, 179 F.3d at 1239 (9th Cir. 1999). They fail to make that showing. Upon review of the parties’ submissions and counsel’s representations at the hearing, it does not appear that Defendants’ noncompliance is due to an inability to comply. Instead, the clear and convincing evidence shows that Defendants have acted intentionally and not in good faith.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 4h ago

El-Sayed on Islamophobia: "That's the only play they got. They're gonna point at me, they're gonna point at my name, like, 'Wow, he's different.' That's the best you got? You can't actually talk about what you want to do? My name is not raising your gas prices. My name is now taking us to war."

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 4h ago

El-Sayed: "Mike Rogers is a guy who wants to put a data center in your backyard so he can make himself feel a little more manly by making an AI video ... he's a guy who went back to Florida so he could lick every single boot Donald Trump owns to bet for his endorsement."

Lᴇɢꜱ Bᴇɴᴇᴅɪᴄᴛ ✨@maybecam.blacksky.app · 6h ago

Waking up to Sharia Law in NYC is crazy. Knicks won, crime is down, 2,000 toddlers are going to school for free, parents got “date night” with nyc babysitters, they’re building housing on city land, small businesses are saving money and selling ice cream. Its sunny out i should go get one.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 4h ago

El-Sayed: "They think they want to use my whole name against me. Mike, listen man, If you can't say the name -- it's Abdulrahman -- keep the name out your damn mouth."

Ben Collins@bencollins.bsky.social · 3h ago

Your little oopsie "mistakes" had me worrying for a year of my life about my partner going to jail for up to a decade based on lies likely fed to you by the top of the federal government. Show everyone what you're covering up in these emails and texts. There's a reason you don't want them released.

Boutros acknowledges 'mistakes' in 'Broadview 6' case but says sanctions, special counsel aren't needed

Chicago's top federal prosecutor noted in a court filing that his office has already dropped charges in the case, implemented “robust root-cause changes” and started the process of reviewing over 1,00...

chicago.suntimes.com

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 4h ago

El-Sayed: "Mike, I'm gonna say it right now, I know you're gonna say no because you're a coward: Five debates, alright? ... By the time we're done, you are not gonna have safe quarter from people holding you accountable to what you've done for them here in Michigan. We will send you back to Florida"

Jon Seidel@jonseidel.bsky.social · 2h ago

A few additional highlights from the feds’ Broadview 6 filing: U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros was emailed a transcript of the 10/9 grand jury session in October but says he didn’t review it and problematic conduct was not brought to his attention until late April:

As to the other grand jury issues, the United States Attorney informed the Court that he first learned of the “vouching” and ex parte conversations in late April 2026.9 Id. at 51-53. The United States Attorney noted that he moved to dismiss the indictment based on his discovery of the vouching and ex parte communications because “we wanted to moot whatever had taken place in the grand jury.” Id. at 51-53, 57-58. Since that time, the AUSAs on the trial team as well as Experienced AUSA 1 have self- reported this Court’s comments—and the entirety of this matter—to the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility (“OPR”), which is the component of the Department responsible for conducting an independent review of allegations of misconduct. 28 C.F.R. § 45.12; Justice Manual § 1-4.200, et. seq. Moreover, as discussed in detail below, the United States Attorney conducted a root cause analysis of the underlying issues giving rise to the dismissal of the indictment and information in this case and has taken numerous remedial steps to help ensure that the missteps that occurred here do not happen again. 9 The United States Attorney was emailed a copy of the transcript from the October 9, 2025, grand jury presentation on October 14, 2025, but has no recollection of reviewing the transcript at that time, and is quite certain he did not review the transcript at that time. The United States Attorney did not receive a copy of the October 16 or October 23, 2025, transcripts until late April 2026, shortly before the Government moved to dismiss the indictment. At that time (late April 2026), the United States Attorney reviewed relevant portions of all three transcripts. Irrespective, no one ever brought the vouching or ex parte issues to the United States Attorney’s attention until late April 2026, nor was the United States Attorney aware of the vouching or ex parte issues until late April 2026.
Jon Seidel@jonseidel.bsky.social · 8h ago

New overnight: Chicago U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros’ office says the “Broadview Six” prosecutors have self-reported the events of the tainted prosecution to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility as it argues against a special counsel. Full filing: cst.brightspotcdn.com/98/58/82c837...