Cheryl Saunders

@cherylas1.bsky.social

Australian and comparative public law in form, theory and practice

Have just finished Shifting Sands by Judith Scheele - a fascinating account of the Sahara and its peoples over time, using a most effective thematic organisational structure. Highly recommended, not only for its insights into a little understood region but for reflections on the state of the world.

I'm not sure who said it but I remember another old quote. Something like "but what if it turns out global warming is all a sham and we improve our health, economy and air quality for nothing. What then?!"

I’m not his biggest fan but Heseltine said roughly this about 30 years ago. Words to the effect of ‘even if there is no climate change what is there not to like about reducing dependency on expensive fossil fuels and getting energy independence? Why would anyone sensibly oppose that?’

Meg Russell has written a chapter on the debate in parliament between 2016 and 2019 in Anthony Seldon's latest book, The Brexit Effect, 2016–2026. Drawing on her 2023 book, she says that parliament 'emerged battered and bruised from the process'. Find out more 👇️

Meg Russell contributes to popular new book on the Brexit Effect

Meg Russell has written a chapter on 'The Debate in Parliament, 2016–19' in Anthony Seldon’s new book The Brexit Effect, 2016–2026.

ucl.ac.uk

The Australian National Audit Office has released its report on the handling of FOI requests by several Departments, including Prime Minister and Cabinet. It's found two-in-three decisions were set aside by the Information Commissioner on appeal. Nearly six in ten applications returned nothing.

anao.gov.au

I share the doubts expressed in all the other comments. More transparency and accountability needed for vetoing grants that have already been through such a laborious process, on such vague grounds.

ARC Tracker@arc-tracker.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Minister @jasonclaremp.bsky.social has vetoed funding for 13 ARC grants based on security grounds. “Security” is the only way they can veto individual grants anymore* (not just a whim like under the previous legislation). From ARC's “Update on Research Security” 👇 www.arc.gov.au/news-and-pub...

Screenshot of the ARC’s “Update on Research Security” showing black text on white background, giving the only information we’re allowed to know about the grants vetoed, i.e. how many and from what schemes. Two from DP26, two from LP25r1, two from LE26, and three from LP25r2.

Hi Bluesky Would someone let my X followers know that I have been suspended by twitter.I will be more active on this site. I will explain the suspension at a later date as it is an intriguing story that’s not devoid of politics. Many thanks.

Time to start getting on the front foot about Acknowledgment of Country. I anticipate it and positively enjoy it. I miss it when I expect it and it doesn’t happen. It gives me a sense of solidarity and place. I don’t know who the naysayers think they’re naysaying, but there may be a lot of us.

Huge -- the High Court has struck down a big loophole for the major parties in Victoria's donation laws. The "nominated entities" loophole let the major parties receive uncapped donations from their fundraising vehicles, while everyone else was strictly limited.