Noam Chomsky Quotes (Year 534)

@chomskyquotes.bsky.social

Collection of Noam Chomsky quotes (***unofficial***). This account is not maintained by Noam Chomsky or his office. This is more of a broadcast than an interactive account. I highly recommend diving into the mentioned sources for more context.

Control of the oil...is a major lever of world control against your enemies. And US enemies are Europe & Asia. Those are the regions of the world that could move towards independence. One of the ways to prevent that is to keep your hand on the spigot. It was understood long ago.

[I]nto the 60s,Western leaders feared that Russia's economic growth would inspire "radical nationalism" elsewhere, & that others too might be stricken by the disease that infected Russia in 1917, when it became unwilling "to complement the industrial economies of the West,"... (1/2)

[S]enior diplomat David Bruce was a leading advocate for European unification in the Kennedy years, urging Washington to “treat a uniting Europe as an equal partner”—but following America’s lead. He saw “dangers” if Europe “struck off on its own, seeking to play a role independent of the US.” (1/2)

In the most sober establishment journal, Foreign Affairs, Samuel Huntington wrote in 1999: “While the US regularly denounces various countries as ‘rogue states’, in the eyes of many countries it is becoming the rogue superpower...the single greatest external threat to their societies.”

IPCC reports are consensus documents. Hence, they tend to err on the side of understatement. [The 2023 one] one strikes me as different. It seems that desperation within the scientific community has reached such a level that the gloves are off and they feel the time has come to be blunt.

Concentrated power pursues the [class] war relentlessly, & very self-consciously. Govt. documents and publications of the business world reveal that they are mostly vulgar Marxists, with values reversed of course. They are also frightened—back to 17th century England in fact.

The term “globalization” is used by power centers to refer to the specific form of international economic integration that has been instituted within the “neoliberal” framework of past several decades. The impact of this investor-rights version of globalization is reasonably clear. (1/2)

It’s entirely obvious why the powerful should have contempt for international law, and why the weak (particularly the former colonies) should generally favor it. The powerful do what they want anyway; treaties and systems of world order don’t offer them any protection.

In general, I think that anarchosyndicalist conceptions — worker’s control, voluntary associations, decentralization and federalism, dissolution of hierarchic and authoritarian structures, and so on — are quite appropriate for the next stage of industrial society. (1/3)

One of the leading Israeli military historians, Martin von Creveld...had an article [in 2006]. I think it was in the IHT in which he said, approximately, “Obviously we don’t want Iran to have nuclear weapons. But if they don’t develop them they are crazy.” (1/3)

In a market system—we have only a partial market system—but markets have inherent what they call “inefficiencies,” really lethal inefficiencies...It’s an inherent part of markets that if you make a transaction, then you look out for yourself not other people. (1/2)

Going back to markets — if you take an economics course, they tell you markets offer choices. That’s partly true, but very narrowly. Markets restrict choices, sharply restrict choices. Mass transportation is an example. Mass transportation is not a choice offered on the market. (1/2)