We’re taking Thermo Fisher to court. 🧵 The multinational corporation failed to provide an employee with a retirement fund option aligned with his religious beliefs. So we’re suing to protect the rights of American workers and open a new front in the fight against climate change.
ClientEarth USA
@clientearthusa.bsky.social
We hold corporations accountable for a livable planet by taking them to court and ratcheting up the pressure of public opinion. Join us. 🌍 www.clientearth.us
In yet another attempt at rolling back climate regulations for polluters, the Trump administration is targeting the Climate Disclosure Rule to let companies hide the truth about climate risk. (1/3)
With @nrdc.org, we helped gather 91,000 petitions urging JPMorgan Chase and Santander to stop backing an LNG project that would harm whales and other vulnerable animals in the Gulf of California. Last week, they were brought straight to these banks by @cclimaticas.bsky.social.
🌡️ Extreme heat is sweeping North America, while smoke from Canadian #wildfires is reaching the Northeast just as fans travel to the region for the World Cup finals. We spoke with Dr. Marc Alessi from @ucs.org about what climate change means for soccer and other outdoor sports.
Why is the federal government suing American states to protect oil companies? Here's what you need to know ⬇️ Read more on our website: brnw.ch/21x3Ma0
Climate change is forcing #WorldCup2026 games to hit pause... and for fans to see more ads. Multiple World Cup venues across North America are expected to regularly exceed safe temperature limits during the tournament, with experts predicting a quarter of all games being impacted. 🧵
Help us tell FIFA to kick big polluters out of soccer. Sign the petition now: brnw.ch/21x3ynq
Tell FIFA: Stop helping fossil fuel polluters clean up their name through sponsorships.
Demand FIFA stop accepting sponsorship money from reckless polluters.
act.clientearth.org
⚽🌍 FIFA says it wants to promote sustainability. Yet the company continues to take money from polluting corporations. Football shouldn’t be a platform for fossil fuel greenwashing. www.theguardian.com/environment/... 👇 Join our call to kick big polluters out of football
The world’s biggest sporting event should not be a billboard for fossil fuel pollution. The World Cup should be about the joy, excitement, and community that soccer brings. Demand FIFA stop accepting sponsorship money from reckless polluters. SIGN NOW: brnw.ch/21x3qLu
The world’s largest banks provided $906bn in finance to the fossil fuel industry last year. And 32% of that came from US banks – the most out of any region. JPMorgan Chase is the leading financier of fossil fuels globally, committing $58.2bn in 2025 alone. Full report: BankingOnClimateChaos.org
Banking on Climate Chaos 2026 - Banking on Climate Chaos
bankingonclimatechaos.org
While communities face deadly heat, smoke-filled skies, and worsening extreme weather linked to fossil fuel pollution, FIFA is allowing Saudi Aramco, the largest fossil fuel polluter in the world, to use the World Cup to polish its image on the global stage. Demand accountability: brnw.ch/21x3mLY
Tell FIFA: Stop helping fossil fuel polluters clean up their name through sponsorships.
Demand FIFA stop accepting sponsorship money from reckless polluters.
brnw.ch
Should reckless corporations fueling the climate crisis be allowed to use the world’s biggest sporting event to clean up their image? We don’t think so.
US corporations have failed to plug an estimated 2.1 million zombie wells. How did we end up with this national crisis of ‘undead’ wells, no longer producing oil or gas, but continuing to pollute the planet? 🧵 #climate #corporateaccountability
Ways to our hearts: 💚 “Recycling is not a solution to the plastics crisis.” 💚 “Individual actions can’t solve climate change when 80% of CO2 emissions have come from only 57 companies.” 💚 “Extreme weather isn’t random. It’s fueled by corporate pollution.”
To-do: ✅ Wake up ✅ Go for a walk outside ✅ Go to court to hold corporations accountable for a livable planet All in a day’s work. What's on your to-do list to protect the planet?
Is your retirement fund managing the biggest financial risk of our era? If you have any retirement savings, you may be exposed to climate risk, or the adverse financial impacts stemming from a changing climate. Learn more about how climate risks can ripple through your 401(k): brnw.ch/21x2BtX
The deadly truth? Exploitation is destroying the ocean. Legal action can stop this. ClientEarth is fighting for a healthy ocean with 16 active cases. For a limited time, all donations will be matched to help power the legal fight to protect the planet. 💙 brnw.ch/21x1Upt
Thrilled to be joining the board of @clientearthusa.bsky.social! We need to use the law to hold companies accountable for a livable planet!Looking forward to putting my corporate law training to good use! 💪
Are you willing to sacrifice blue whale calves or the critically endangered vaquita porpoise for more fossil fuels? Santander Bank is backing a destructive fossil fuel project in the Gulf of California. It would turn this biodiversity hotspot into a shipping corridor for LNG tankers.
The largest heart on Earth is the size of a small elephant. It belongs to the blue whale. Right now, a massive gas project threatens to destroy their home in the Gulf of California forever. If we work together, we can protect this irreplaceable ecosystem. #WhalesOrGas brnw.ch/21x1mGQ
Santander Bank is backing a fossil fuel project that would turn the Gulf of California, a calving ground for blue whales, into a shipping corridor for liquefied natural gas tankers. We cannot sacrifice these whales for the sake of more climate-harming gas. Take action today! brnw.ch/21x1hzm
When climate disasters hit the physical world, they hit your retirement savings too. ClientEarth is going to court to make sure the people managing your retirement money live up to their legal duty to assess and protect you from climate risks. Learn more >> brnw.ch/21x1dCw
The 2000s are back in style – but let’s not take it too far. If we’re not careful, we could end up with a financial mess on par with the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008. 🧵
Are your retirement investments ready for climate risk? Here’s how one hurricane, in another state, could turn disastrous for your savings: 🧵
For the first time, a lawsuit directly challenges whether Cushman & Wakefield fulfilled its fiduciary duty when managing climate-related financial risk in a retirement plan. The outcome could have significant implications for the $12 trillion retirement fund sector. Learn more here:
Real estate group Cushman & Wakefield sued over climate risk to worker retirement savings
Case could influence wider legal questions about how long-term risks apply to fiduciary duties
ft.com
BREAKING: One of the world’s largest real estate corporations, Cushman & Wakefield, is risking its workers’ retirement funds by investing in climate-risky funds. We’re highlighting a groundbreaking lawsuit to hold the company accountable in court. #GreenSky
A climate timebomb could decimate retirement portfolios. Here are some numbers about climate risk >> 🧵
A climate time bomb is ticking in America’s retirement accounts. We’re going to court to stop it. Most of us work hard, put money aside with each paycheck, and trust it will be there when we retire. But that trust is being betrayed.
What's going on with big oil and #SCOTUS? This week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case that's essentially about whether cities and states can sue oil companies for climate change or not.
Environmental and health groups filed a lawsuit on Wednesday morning, arguing that the EPA’s move to eliminate limits on greenhouse gases from vehicles, and potentially other sources, was illegal. The matter is likely to end up before the Supreme Court.
E.P.A. Faces First Lawsuit Over Its Killing of Major Climate Rule
Environmental and health groups sued the E.P.A. over its elimination of the endangerment finding. The matter is likely to end up before the Supreme Court.
nyti.ms
BREAKING: Trump’s EPA repeals the 2009 endangerment finding. The endangerment finding wasn’t politics — it was science translated into law. Repealing it doesn’t change the facts. It weakens the federal government’s ability to curb climate pollution and protect communities.