Leonard Fein | Cognivox

@cognivox.bsky.social

I write on psychiatry and depression to help orient patients and the public. I approach this work as a medical writer first and as a patient with depression second. Too many books; too few shelves.

The Manhattan DA indicted a psychotherapist for allegedly sexually assaulting two patients. Can NY immediately bar them from unsupervised patient contact? No. An emergency license suspension requires at least five days before a hearing. Weekends and holidays don’t count. That’s wrong.

"Psychiatry is a pathology of freedom: it is medicine applied to the diminishments of freedom." — Henri Ey, 1948 Ey is using the word "pathology" here to mean the study of pathological conditions, rather than as a synonym for "disease" itself. (My translation from the original French.)

When you hear the name of a psychiatric drug, what comes to mind? For me: Vraylar is a Norse god. Caplyta is a sports drink. And bupropion is an animatronic purple gummy bear cheerfully urging me to seize the day. What are your associations?

Not all the letters after a mental health practitioner's name tell you the same kind of thing. Some point to licensure. Others describe education, certification, membership, or recognition. Sort first. Decode second.

The other day I searched the Library of Congress catalog for print books with “psychiatry” in the title. Of 3,437 results, the very first was David Cooper’s “Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry” (1967). The catalog has a sense of humor.

We call them antidepressants. An older word was thymoleptics. “Antidepressant” names the medication by what it opposes: depression. “Thymoleptic” names it by what it acts on: temper, emotion, mood. One term names the enemy. The other names the terrain. #Psychiatry

In debates over psychiatric “deprescribing,” the term has become an amalgam. It can refer to dose reduction, stopping one drug, consolidating a crowded regimen, managing withdrawal, or rethinking long-term treatment. Same neighborhood, different questions. Blurring them muddles the discussion.

Psychiatry and Religion in Two Textbooks: ‘[…] ministers often feel qualified to offer information and advice about how to handle “psychiatric problems” even though they may be unaware of distinctions as fundamental as the difference between psychiatry and psychology.’ (2021) #Psychiatry

→ Marginalia: Five psychiatry textbooks, five different conceptions of where the field begins. Each revealed by a single choice: what to put first. What do you think should come first – and why? a) The patient b) The encounter c) The examination d) The diagnosis e) The brain #Psychiatry

[1/3] Book Route The other week, I bought a Polish psychiatry book from a seller who wouldn’t ship to the US. My only option was to set up a forwarding address in Germany. The seller ships to Germany; a forwarder reships to me. It felt vaguely clandestine. (Now it feels mundane.)

[1/10] Of Bibles, Constitutions, and DSM The DSM is often called “psychiatry’s bible.” The metaphor is vivid, and it captures how the manual shapes lives, governs institutions, and informs culture. But it is incomplete. DSM is less a bible than a constitution.

[1/5] Beyond the Opening Chapter In the previous threads, I looked only at opening chapter titles – what a textbook announces before it says anything else. Here, I relax that rule. These titles sit further inside their books. Let's dig deeper.

Reading my way through psychiatry textbooks from around the world, comparing how they begin. A US textbook begins with the brain. An Indian one with the clinical examination. A British one with the patient's perspective. What comes first is rarely accidental. #booksky