Chris Weatherspoon

@cweatherspoon.bsky.social

Football Finance Writer at The Athletic UK | Will write about money for football | Views are not someone else's 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗦/𝗧𝗜𝗣𝗦: 📧 cweatherspoon@theathletic.com 🔗 https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/author/chris-weatherspoon/

It should really go without saying that, just as football wasn't Gianni Infantino's to sell, nor is a World Cup final his to trade in exchange for personal support The fact he even thinks of this as appropriate, alongside everything else, disqualifies him from remaining in post

Arsenal spent £185m+ in transfer fees last season on players over 24, a single-season mark only topped by Al Hilal in 2023-24 (Neymar, Malcom, Neves, Mitrovic + more) and PSG in 2017-18 (erm, Neymar). Going big on experience again w/Bruno Guimaraes They want to win *now* (again)

Eddie Howe is out. So is Newcastle United's first post-takeover era Big sales dominate but buying shift is stark. £110m on under-21s already. Only two English clubs have ever spent more in one season on that group Numbers, reasons here: @theathleticfc.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/athletic/748...

Newcastle’s transfer strategy has shifted: What does it say about PIF and where does it leave the club? (Gift Article)

A range of internal and external factors have caused the club's owners to turn off the spending taps on Tyneside

nytimes.com

Football ended European Super League but blew the reconstruction and got Super League-lite. It cannot blow the moment with FIFA. A president who thought himself omnipotent is weak; shoddy governance in full glare. End cult leadership and a patronage system all too ripe for abuse

Eddie Howe is out. So is Newcastle United's first post-takeover era Big sales dominate but buying shift is stark. £110m on under-21s already. Only two English clubs have ever spent more in one season on that group Numbers, reasons here: @theathleticfc.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/athletic/748...

Newcastle’s transfer strategy has shifted: What does it say about PIF and where does it leave the club? (Gift Article)

A range of internal and external factors have caused the club's owners to turn off the spending taps on Tyneside

nytimes.com

Football ended European Super League but blew the reconstruction and got Super League-lite. It cannot blow the moment with FIFA. A president who thought himself omnipotent is weak; shoddy governance in full glare. End cult leadership and a patronage system all too ripe for abuse

Important: FIFA claim one-off $20m available to members, provided by the sell-off, is for "long-term development" projects, but members only have until 19 September to assent So 53 days to cost and plan long-term projects and work out best way to get value from an arbitrary sum

'Inviting private investment to the table hardly points football in the direction of philanthropy; they will want their money back and more. Private capital and global development, which FIFA repeatedly cites itself as an important player in, tend not to be bedfellows.' 👇

Chris Weatherspoon@cweatherspoon.bsky.social · 6d ago

FIFA want to set up a new subsidiary, shift the World Cup there...then sell off a chunk of it for billions and give all of it to member associations. But what are they actually proposing? Is it akin to other sports? And...why?! Analysis @theathleticfc.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/athletic/747...

Hard to take stock when new twists are flying in every hour but football could well be witnessing the real-time defenestration of a FIFA president who less than a fortnight ago thought himself invincible and the mastermind behind "the best show in the world". Delicious hubris

How much FIFA needs UEFA's teams is pretty obvious but, to put some numbers to it, performance-based prize money: • 2025 Club World Cup: 12 UEFA teams (out of 32 total) took home 67% of the pot • 2026 men's World Cup: 16 UEFA teams (out of 48 total) took home 57% of the pot

'Inviting private investment to the table hardly points football in the direction of philanthropy; they will want their money back and more. Private capital and global development, which FIFA repeatedly cites itself as an important player in, tend not to be bedfellows.' 👇

Chris Weatherspoon@cweatherspoon.bsky.social · 6d ago

FIFA want to set up a new subsidiary, shift the World Cup there...then sell off a chunk of it for billions and give all of it to member associations. But what are they actually proposing? Is it akin to other sports? And...why?! Analysis @theathleticfc.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/athletic/747...

Thing is, FIFA reckon just by hiving out commercial and events operations into a single, focused entity, they can generate enough to pay 211 member associations $4.2bn in 2027-30, $4.6bn in 2031-34 and $5.1bn in 2035-38, so why the need for a one-off equity sale too...