Daniel ☀:oh_no_bubble:

@danielmunoz.maly.io.ap.brid.gy

Daniel Muñoz, persona humana, pagano naturalista y humanista, antifascista, desarrollador de software, miembro de https://kipullaxta.org.pe, cientófilo. El diseño […] 🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://maly.io/@danielmunoz, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

Todos los días veo al menos un conductor de limeño llevando encendidas las luces antiniebla delanteras, cegando a peatones y conductores por igual. Es algo que se puede ver de día y de noche. A los limeños les encanta cegar con sus luces a los demás usuarios de la vía pública.

Considerando que casi todo en la vida es política, el problema no es mezclar el fútbol con la política. El problema es mezclar el fútbol con el fascismo, con el odio, con la violencia, con la discriminación. El problema es ponérsela botando a los fachas para que vengan a rematar a placer.

Dos factores de la caída en PISA: 1. Usar la IA 2. Ser pijo https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/09/08/students-who-dont-use-ai-are-ahead-on-every-measure/

Every year, the OECD surveys students around the world for the Programme for International Student Assessment. The 2025 results were just released today. [_OECD_ _;__OECD_ _, PDF_] Around the world, results have gone down over the past ten years. But PISA includes an AI measurement. How do students do when they use the chatbot in school? It turns out that winners don’t do chatbots. The graphs show that students with little or no AI use trounce the students who do use the AI: > In these scenarios, students who do not use AI outperform those who do, on average, by around 20 points — equivalent to being around one year of schooling ahead of their peers. The summary subheading claims “the relationship between AI use and student performance is complex”. What that means is the AI avoiders do much better. The kids who do use AI do at best about the same. Some do slightly better — but also just happen to be richer. The report’s intro notes the obvious: > In the same way that we do not become fit by watching sports but by doing sports, learning does not occur through the consumption of content, but as a productive cognitive struggle of the mind with new material. Of course, the report then tries to both-sides: > If we get this right, AI becomes a scaffold, not a crutch. A tool for thinking, not a substitute for it. But I suggest there’s one responsible approach to the homework machine in education: don’t. Winners stay left behind. * _Video_ _—_ _Podcast_ ### Share this post: * Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook * Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn * Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit * Share on X (Opens in new window) X * Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon * Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky * Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email * ### Like this: Like Loading… ### _Related_

pivot-to-ai.com

I’m really convinced that the current artificial intelligence trend will accelerate the evolution of mankind. For instance, in the movie Idiocracy. it takes 500 years for humans to evolve from 2005 human to full blown idiots. Well, with ChatGPT, Claude and all the others, I’m sure we can […]

Original post on mamot.fr

mamot.fr