Daryl Janzen

@darylj.bsky.social

philosophical physicist/cosmologist interested in understanding what reality is.

I wrote a book this summer that fleshes out the details of a physics framework I began working on with my PhD thesis seventeen years ago. It’s freely available on my website. Here’s a link to the preface. 🧪🎢🔭☄️🧮⚛️ cosmicave.org/2026/09/10/p...

The Universe: from an antimatter black hole

A friend’s question about an Eddington–Finkelstein diagram sent me looking for a better explanation, and I found a cycloid. Eighteen papers later, here is what came of it: horizons that are n…

cosmicave.org

A month ago. The preprint I posted of a 7-page paper that proves geometrically using nothing but standard GR that the common idea we’ve had of a black hole for a century is wrong. It’s been downloaded 488 times. Surely someone knows GR well enough to comment. 🧮 ⚛️ ☄️ 🧪 cosmicave.org/wp-content/u...

cosmicave.org

Daryl Janzen@darylj.bsky.social · 6mo ago

I just finished it. The last piece of the puzzle I started working on for my PhD thesis 17 years ago finally fell into place. Wow. That is so beautiful to see. cosmicave.org/2026/03/30/w... 🧪 ⚛️ 🎢 ☄️ 🔭

Here’s a fun little tour of the basic geometric principles of relativity. 🧮 ⚛️ 🧪 ☄️ 🎢 cosmicave.org/2026/05/11/x/ Requires only middle school level math—intervals, Pythagorean theorem, functions and asymptotes. It delivers a very simple proof that black holes aren’t what we’ve thought they are.

Chapter X: in which the inquisitive astronaut reveals the metric singularity

A geometric proof that black holes remain finite in size/density, and the event horizon occurs as the next moment after the universe.

cosmicave.org

Black hole geometry is wild. 🧮 ⚛️ 🎢 ☄️ 🧪 Take the blue ingoing null line just before the astronaut dives in to be a ray of photons that encounters beam splitters the whole way down, at regular intervals that reflect some photons directly back out along the outgoing red null lines. 1/

Bild

I’d be happy to explain any point you’d like to discuss further from the article itself. I don’t think you understand it or its purpose. This is an explainer following conceptual logic (which is a form of proof in itself, though that’s irrelevant), of the results of a formal mathematical proof…1/

You should have responded like this to Greg Egan: when the star’s surface reaches the horizon, what is the metrical distance of that event from every “future” event when every future infaller reaches the horizon? How far apart are those two events? What’s the proper distance between them?” 1/2

When a star collapses to a black hole, from the outside it never quite gets there. Everything that ever falls in reaches the horizon together, at the end of time. And then it becomes a new universe, expanding at exactly the rate we observe in our own. 🧪 🧮 ⚛️ ☄️ 🔭 🎢 cosmicave.org/2026/04/14/w...

When black holes happen

When a star collapses to a black hole, from the outside it never quite gets there. Everything that ever falls in reaches the horizon together, at the end of time. What follows isn’t destructi…

cosmicave.org

When an astronaut jumps into a black hole billions of years after a star collapsed, note that he still always “sees” the star as it was before it reached the horizon. As he approaches the horizon, which he reaches in finite time, he ALWAYS remains lightlike connected to the pre-horizon,…1/

Surely there must be some black hole or GW physicist out there, or some geometer or relativist, who can follow and would be interested in a formal geometric proof that clearly shows how and why we’ve been wrong about the physics of gravitational collapse for nearly a century… ⚛️ #mathsky ☄️

Bild
Daryl Janzen@darylj.bsky.social · 6mo ago

I proved a pure geometric theorem that says the black holes we know exist in our universe will become new universes that form after the end of our universe, and that each one must appear to its observers just as ours appears to us, with the exact expansion rate following an initial singularity.

I proved a pure geometric theorem that says the black holes we know exist in our universe will become new universes that form after the end of our universe, and that each one must appear to its observers just as ours appears to us, with the exact expansion rate following an initial singularity.

Dude. The universe is a black hole. I essentially proved it mathematically, using principles of geometry and causality that we all know and are completely foundational to general relativity. I just put the pieces together correctly. It turns out we had the wrong idea about what a black hole is.

Wait a minute! Are there physicists out there who think there are black holes in our universe that have already completed gravitational collapse in our causal past? You do all know when we look at Cygnus X-1 we are seeing its companion star—the whole system including the BH—BEFORE horizon formation?

Ok, let me test out this proof on you. Please tell me if you find it convincing, or if you see any error in the logic. The upshot: every black hole merger must occur before the collapsing star became smaller than its horizon. Before it became a “black hole”.1/9🧵 🧪 ⚛️ 🎢 #cosmology #philsky #philsci

I know I've said this a trillion times but I have to say it periodically to keep from going insane: The right ran a huge, well-funded, & ultimately successful campaign to completely take over political media & the infosphere more generally. This is by far the most important political development...