David V. Wright

@davevwright.bsky.social

Law prof. Environment, natural resources, energy, sustainability, negotiation, treaties, oceans, Arctic. Unapologetic fan of Indie Folk. And 90s rap. And Vegemite. UC: https://profiles.ucalgary.ca/david-wright

“Canada’s Grey New Deal” - my piece in The Star today. TLDR: wave of deregulation crash crashing across Canada can be thought of a Grey New Deal that prioritizes rapid development through deregulation and weakening of existing environmental laws. Days of considering a Green New Deal are long gone.

Gift-redeem

thestar.com

Huge win for environmental law today as Federal Court of Appeal reverses lower court by upholding federal listing of Plastic Manufactured Items as toxic. Expect fireworks from all sides politically, but this is a helpful step in clarifying this area of the law. decisions.fca-caf.ca/fca-caf/deci...

Canada (Attorney General) v. Responsible Plastic Use Coalition - Federal Court of Appeal

The Federal Court of Appeal is a bilingual, bijural court that makes decisions on matters of federal law across Canada.

decisions.fca-caf.ca

Political hot potatoes giving way to cooler heads? Devilish details will matter. Aspects I’ll be watching: language around Indigenous & B.C. consent, target tanker ban exemption vs repeal, pathways plus price tag… and how this all fits in Canada’s carbon budget (or not!). www.cbc.ca/news/politic...

Ottawa, Alberta agree to broad outlines of energy deal, including path to pipeline | CBC News

Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith have agreed to the broad outlines of a memorandum of understanding that would give Alberta special exemptions from federal environmental l...

cbc.ca

Helpful modelling from @pembina.org here. Canada and Alberta should both be transparently doing same and then relating it to comprehensive emission reduction plans and scenarios that demonstrate achieving climate commitments (or not). Present “grand bargain” discourse needs to be contextualized.

Pembina Institute@pembina.org · 10mo ago

A new pipeline paired with carbon capture may sound promising, but the numbers tell a different story. Our analysis finds the so-called “grand bargain” would result in oilsands emissions going up, even with the Pathways carbon capture project.

First 5 PONIs now identified under the Building Canada Act. But is it a case of hot to trot, or all for naught? TLDR: legal framework is in place to corral PONIs and lead to greenlight pastures. But it behooves the govt to get implementation right at this early juncture. ablawg.ca/2025/09/25/f...

First Five Building Canada Act Projects of National Interest (PONIs): Hot to Trot, or All for Naught?

By: David V. Wright Matter Commented On: Building Canada Act, SC 2025, c 2, s 4 PDF Version: First Five Building Canada Act Projects of National Interest (PONIs): Hot to Trot, or All for Naught? Af…

ablawg.ca

What’s going on with federal climate policy? C-5 has taken up a lot of oxygen so it’s fair to wonder. Also fair to fret. We do have a law to reduce risk of backslipping. Is it up to the task? Can we have no fear, or at least less fear, because CNZEAA is still here? My latest via @ablawg.bsky.social

ABlawg UCalgary@ablawg.bsky.social · last yr.

New Post: Federal Climate Plans, Policies and Projections: Have no fear, CNZEAA is (still) here? ablawg.ca/2025/06/23...

Bill C-5 / Building Canada Act sure ain’t impact assessment; it’s an unprecedented deregulation move in modern times. Serious risk that ‘move fast and make things’ results in move fast and break things’. Leap before you look = risky at best. w/ @molszyns.bsky.social ablawg.ca/2025/06/10/b...

Bill C-5: Move Fast and Make Things, or Move Fast and Break Things? - ABLawg

By: David V. Wright and Martin Olszynski Bill Commented On: Bill C-5 - An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act PDF Version: Bill C-5: Move Fast and...

ablawg.ca

And just like that, it’s over. But what a two weeks it was for this special group of students in this year’s Modern Treaties & the Law course in the Yukon. Deep experiential learning, immersed in special spaces and communities. Huge thanks to all involved, including these courageous students.

BildBildBildBild

A must read post by my colleague and impact assessment guru, Arlene Kwasniak. The case for federal impact assessment is not just some intergenerational moralistic plea. It’s rooted in economics imperatives, constitutional obligations, scientific integrity, ecosystem realities, and good governance.

Arlene Kwasniak@arlenejk.bsky.social · last yr.

We must defend the role of federal environmental assessment in Canada, not wrongly denigrate it: ablawg.ca/2025/04/21/t...

Watching the federal debate? Want fact check resource re ‘C-69’? Voila below. Reality - federal project assessment regime gives ample basis to show case project benefits. For better or worse, thumb is on scale for *approving* all projects, incl energy projects. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

The New Federal Impact Assessment Act: Implications for Canadian Energy Projects

Implementation of the new Impact Assessment Act regime is now underway, changing the process for federal assessment of energy projects. While the reformed regim

papers.ssrn.com