@davidkinney.bsky.social

Assistant Professor in Philosophy at WashU (St Louis). http://davidbkinney.com

Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as woke 1, the second time as woke 2.

Teaching intro logic is just saying "in ordinary life this is an epistemic success term, but in a logic class it just denotes a syntactic property" over and over.

Lindsay Graham dying after saying “I’ll go to the hospital right after I do meet the press” is funny but then I could easily see myself at 71 saying “I’ll go to the hospital right after my talk” only to be taken out of the Palmer house in a body bag.

This paper is fantastic: link.springer.com/article/10.1.... IMO there is an lack of intellectual humility in the way that some philosophers are super-quick to jettison standard methods in probability theory in favor of their intuitions. This paper is a wonder antidote to that.

Are nonmeasurable sets significant for epistemology? - Synthese

Probabilism holds that rational credence functions are probability functions defined over some probability space $$(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$$ . According to some recent philosophical arguments, in som...

link.springer.com

I feel like if anyone came up with a discussion-ending argument against semantic pragmatism, intuitionism, etc., then it would belong in Phil Review and not some report.

On the Miller Light essay in the Atlantic: 1. The idea that drinking cheap beer is somehow counter-normative within a grad school cohort is completely opposite from my experience. 2. I can see how one could become a beer snob to deal with genuine class-based angst during grad school, BUT...

I recently read this whole paper while doing the overnight with my two month old and I think it's about as good an example I can think of for philosophy making progress. Dynamical systems provide sound and complete models for relevance logic! academic.oup.com/mind/article...

The Logic of Dynamical Systems Is Relevant

Abstract. Lots of things are usefully modelled in science as dynamical systems: growing populations, flocking birds, engineering apparatus, cognitive agent

academic.oup.com

The wardrobe for dirk, Nash, griffin and Haslam on prime is terrible. An NBA pre-game panel should be in ridiculous mob boss suits. Amazon has them dressed like the partners of an architecture firm in shoreditch.

excellent piece, and should be required reading for anyone skeptical of the technical capabilities and policy implications of AI. there are certainly exceptions, but by and large, the political left is currently treating what should be a five-alarm fire like a distasteful spectator sport.

The left is missing out on AI

As a movement, it has largely refused to engage seriously with AI, ceding debate about a threat and opportunity to the right

transformernews.ai

Despite it all, I still think it's important, as I just asked of a hypothetical future reader, that we "consider a pigeon that is trained, before the time t when grue objects change from green to blue, to peck at all and only green objects."

A lot of philosophers working on causation in a formal mode neglect that the “variables” in causal bayes nets are random variables, or functions defined on a sample space that are measurable with respect to some probability space.

Post nicht verfügbar.

Time for my extremely pedantic thing. “Football” means a game played on a field *on foot*, as opposed to on horseback. So you have association football, rugby football, American football, Aussie rules football, and so on. Kicking has nothing to do with the etymology.

Alessandro Rigolon@alerigolon.bsky.social · 12mo ago

The U.S. is very insular - We call football soccer, and our “football” doesn’t involve kicking the ball much - We use imperial units when most other countries use the metric system - We call the country “America” while most of the world uses that name for the continent What else?