Dead Neanderthals

@deadneanderthals.bsky.social

Dead Neanderthals set out for the solar system. Their ultimate goal is currently unknown, but it probably lies far beyond the borders of this galaxy. linktr.ee/deadneanderthals

I’ve been loving seeing so many feminist, interdisciplinary and decolonial perspectives in open research, and I’ve got some work in progress in this area which feels exciting 🩷 More of this please and less of the surveillance and “automated” science

Just received the terrible news that Bob Rusche past away. Bob was very important for underground music in the Netherlands. He gave small bands airplay on his radio show X-Rated and was present at many shows. But most important: Bob was a wonderful person. We will miss him dearly. Rest in Power

Anita@anitaduits.bsky.social · last mo.

Met een hart vol liefde en verdriet wil ik jullie laten weten dat mijn allerliefste Bob is overleden. Hij was zo mooi, zo lief, zo dierbaar. Rust zacht, lieve Bob.

Just received the terrible news that Bob Rusche past away. Bob was very important for underground music in the Netherlands. He gave small bands airplay on his radio show X-Rated and was present at many shows. But most important: Bob was a wonderful person. We will miss him dearly. Rest in Power

Anita@anitaduits.bsky.social · last mo.

Met een hart vol liefde en verdriet wil ik jullie laten weten dat mijn allerliefste Bob is overleden. Hij was zo mooi, zo lief, zo dierbaar. Rust zacht, lieve Bob.

Thanks, but your description contradicts my experience. In practice your system heavily interferes with meaningful editorial control over reviewer invitations, which goes to the core of peer-review integrity. This isn't a 'communication shortfall'—it's a systemic choice you made.

Frontiers@frontiersin.bsky.social · 2mo ago

2/3 By design, the Associate Editor’s expertise and reviewer invitations always take precedence. The peer-review system is built to support the editor’s decisions, and you retain the ability to revoke, replace, or invite additional reviewers at any point in the process.

I am sending an open letter to Thermo Fisher. Their response to my response to their manipulated western blot is bullying and petty. Yes, this western blot really is manipulated, it is unfair on me to say otherwise. I don't make those accusations lightly, and I have a (minor) reputation to defend.

Bild

The Thermo Fisher situation keeps getting worse. We've now collected 450+ problematic images presented as verification data in TF's antibody catalog. This includes: 🖌️ Dozens more images with duplications or painting 🖨️ Hundreds of blots that all share the same background (behold slideshow below)