Diana Enriquez, PhD

@denrsch.bsky.social

Sociologist via @Princeton.edu PhD (labor, tech & orgs) | writing a book about freelancers’ strategies | Principal, Technology Strategy & Design at Redstone Strategy Group

The SNAP cuts in a K-shaped recovery (aka where wall street looks good, but organizations are cutting headcount and asking existing workers to do more with less) feel especially brutal to a lot of people.

AI “puts more pressure on jobs built around repeatable [tasks] more so than work that depends on trust, physical presence, relationships, care, judgment or accountability.” AKA the human variables AI cannot neatly account for more often than not www.forbes.com/sites/ronsch...

AI Won’t Replace Everyone. That’s Not The Good News

The story is starting to get more specific than the usual “robots are coming for jobs” narrative. AI is beginning to sort the labor market by task, age, skill level and geography.

forbes.com

Earlier this year I wrote about how AI “hype” often oversimplifies the human elements and design including how quickly automated systems devolve into issues to solve rather than efficiency creating technology and the pressure workers are feeling to adapt or be “left behind”

In Weak Job Market, Middle Managers Increasingly Forced to Feign AI Success

Amid all the hype, companies need human-centered AI that helps workers. Policymakers must protect labor at every level, writes Diana Enriquez.

techpolicy.press

In dozens of interviews, sociologist, UX researcher, and interaction designer Diana Enriquez finds middle managers forced to "feign AI success" in a weak job market—for instance, pretending error-free drafts came from AI tools that actually failed.

In Weak Job Market, Middle Managers Increasingly Forced to Feign AI Success

Amid all the hype, companies need human-centered AI that helps workers. Policymakers must protect labor at every level, writes Diana Enriquez.

buff.ly