Des Fitzgerald

@desfitzgerald.bsky.social

Co-director: https://www.ucc.ie/en/future-humanities/radicalhumanitieslaboratory/

Honestly, the sheer amount of self-satisfied pontificating and moralising on this issue - much of it from well-known reactionary goons in my own field - is going to negatively polarise me into a pro-plagiarism position.

This is such a grotesque attempt to make it impossible for trans people to exist in public. To do it in the name of "equality and human rights" is especially cruel. Solidarity to all UK trans friends and colleagues facing this collective madness. www.timeshighereducation.com/news/ehrc-gu...

EHRC guidance on single-sex spaces a ‘big shift’ for universities

New code confirms trans people can be excluded from facilities on basis of biological sex but experts say that does not make grappling with competing responsibilities any easier

timeshighereducation.com

I very much wish there was more focus on C*mbridge University in this discussion, as an unabashedly colonial institution trying to make individual scholars symbolically remediate its own dreadful relationship to the world. But of course individuals cannot possibly play this role, and here we are.

I think my big takeaway from the guardian plagiarism article is to wonder if this is the first time something actually newsworthy happened at the british sociological association annual conference.

There's lots that's batshit about UK academia of course, but this thing where every year a selection of everyone's publications get anonymously scored by their senior colleagues is by far the craziest aspect.

A post that says: "Just finished this year's round of internal REF reading: one of the many tasks in academia that is hidden from view. Always nice to read colleagues' work; less nice to have to write a report and score it against quite loose descriptors."

Delighted to say I've always hated Monty Python and their twee English public school humour. Always kind of felt like it was being performed for an audience of misanthropic ex-colonial administrators. The absolute worst.

It's interesting that when I was an undergrad, 25 years ago, the construct, 'the culture industry,' read as dull, safe, platitudionous even, whereas today the same set of claims feel vital and urgent, maybe even alarming to the 1st-time reader.

How did people who take themselves to be broadly on the left become so convinced that any critique of mass/popular culture is morally, even politically bad? It's obvs a minor part, but still a part I think of understanding the last decade.