Claas Voelcker

@cvoelcker.bsky.social

For professional, see https://cvoelcker.de If I seem very angry, check if I have been watered in the last 24 hours. Now 🇺🇸 flavoured, previously available in 🇨🇦 and 🇩🇪

Noone will like this, but I just got a bunch of negative reviews for a paper and I'm NOT mad! The critique was reasonable, the improvement suggestions feasible, and everybody seems to have understood what we did correctly. Peer review can work!

There are so many major problems with the "Go big" advice, and I would love it if senior people started addressing them: - "Go big" is close to impossible without practising in the small first - Not publishing frequently locks you out from almost all networking to find good collaborators

Clément Canonne@ccanonne.github.io · 4d ago

"We're all worried," as what it means to do research (in my field, Theoretical CS) seems to be shifting, and shifting fast. What to do? Senior researchers must lead by example, knowing that not everything will pan out. What I'm suggesting below may not work everywhere, but here's my own advice: 1/

"Write dumb rebuttals, get dumb replies" I think the LLM era has made me appreciate brevity sooooooooooo much more. I get it now, I apologize, everything should just be a single line.

This is a robot failing to grasp a ball. Almost every robot lab produces clips like this daily… and almost all of them get thrown away. This is the most abundant but underused resource in robot learning. We’re collecting all of it now as “OopsieData”, please join us at oopsie-data.com! (1/13)

Und selbst wenn es wirklich ein Fall von islamistischem Terror ist ist das wieder nur extrem convenient um damit dann weiteren Rassismus und „Ausländer“hass zu schüren anstatt sich darüber Gedanken zu machen wie man auch hier den Boden für weiteren Hass selbst ebnet.

Reciprocal reviewing needs to be tuned to the amount of papers you submit. Currently I think I fall into the most punished category: I submit roughly 1-2 papers per conference, and I always review. If I submitted 4x the amount, I would still have to review the same amount.