Berna Devezer

@devezer.bsky.social

Metascientist @ uidaho. Behavioral sciences, stats, modeling, phil of science. Cat slave, cook, sailor (see: https://bsky.app/profile/kumrusails.bsky.social), photographer, clarinet student, adventurer, nature lover. Allergic to unsolicited advice.

If moderation tools were made available only to those who never ever have an unpopular opinion, none of us would have moderation. So I suppose it'd be nice if we stopped the fake incredulity about people using their blocks/mutes as they wish. It's only ever cringe to complain about it.

Bay Area friends: would you consider opening your home to these two cuddly cats? A friend found them behind a gas station. Their sibling, a black cat, got adopted, but it appears no one likes orange cats. They are being kept in a bathroom for the time being and need a home.

Two orange cats in a cage with food and water.Two orange cats in a cage with food and water.Two orange cats laying on the floor. Two orange cats in a spare bathroom with food and water and a litter box.
derek guy@dieworkwear.bsky.social · 4w ago

A friend of mine found these three kittens behind a Bay Area gas station. They are tame, vaccinated, and incredibly affectionate. Unfortunately, she's unable to keep them and I'm trying to find them a home. They are at risk of going to a shelter. Bay Area people, are you open to adopting?

Three kittens in a cage. Two are orange and one is black.

Finally got my camera sensor and lenses professionally cleaned. Hopefully no more smudges or weird spots in my photos for a while 🤞🏼 This alone is a reason to get a different camera for each lens tbh!

yes the jonah hill interview is immensely dunkable but when people go through an intense experience that changes how they view themselves, it takes a while to absorb and assimilate it. until then, it becomes a dominating, all-encompassing force. given the immense fatphobia he must have internalized

Thanks very much for taking the time to do this Berna. It's good to hear some diverse views in this area. I particularly liked your last point about interdisciplinarity and “cross-pollination.” So important for an area like metascience.

(10) What question should I have asked you, and what’s your answer?

Q: In your research program, what has benefited you most?

A: Reading outside of my area (such as it is) and collaborating with colleagues from diverse backgrounds and disciplines. In the last decade, I have read anything I found interesting, setting all pragmatic considerations and disciplinary boundaries aside. I find myself reading books and papers in statistics, mathematics, philosophy of science, history of science, science and technology studies, psychology, sociology, computer science, economics, political science — you name it. Qualitative, quantitative, empirical, theoretical… I was also lucky enough to interact and collaborate with scholars from many fields. I cannot imagine doing the work of the past decade without such cross-pollination. Allowing myself to feel professionally homeless (without a proper base discipline) has set me free to do the kind of work that compels and excites me, and that I find internally rewarding.

And I worry that the movement's messaging could further undermine public trust in science. By fueling the perception that most scientists have something to hide (thus creating the need for transparency). And by feeding the "do your own research" narrative that has undermined trust in scientists. 3/

Price is by far the most legible characteristic in a low-information online marketplace, so yes, people will index on it often. That doesn't mean it's what they *want*. They are satisficing not the object but the process of choosing the object.

Perhaps consider placing an order for this awesome book via your library! Mark's thread has some sneak peek into one of the chapters. Here's a preprint of our chapter on exploratory research.

researchgate.net

Mark Rubin@markrubin.bsky.social · 3d ago

“Theory and Model Building in Psychology” New book edited by @fabianhutmacher.bsky.social and Alexander Wendt, with chapters by @ufeest.bsky.social, @devezer.bsky.social, @mieronen.bsky.social, and @bringmannlaura.bsky.social. link.springer.com/content/pdf/...

wilson's review, while arguably similar in style, is nothing like the apparently normalized ruthlessness in academic peer review, due to the simple fact that nolan's making the movie or its success did not, at all, hinge on her evaluation. so many people being so weird about this is bizarre to me.

One of the articles I reviewed this year had a subsection titled 'belonging' and I had to inform the author(s) that none of their data had anything to do with belonging but that was ok, they could call it something else and I even included literature to help build their lit review.

Berna Devezer@devezer.bsky.social · 4d ago

Telling the authors to cut a specific, and particularly controversial, line of argumentation is only one of many paths to pursue but hardly the most plausible one. As a reviewer, I often identify the issues or challenges in my evaluation of a paper, suggest a few alternative paths to address it

"And so Arnold began reaching out to other people who said science was untrustworthy and giving them money." A MUST-READ post about open sci/metasci funding, philanthropist agendas, and academic censorship in the name of scientific reform. There's so much I want to quote. Better read it yourself!

Jeff Lockhart@jwlockhart.bsky.social · 5d ago

I wrote about science funding, science reform, and anti-science agendas. scatter.wordpress.com/2026/07/31/s...

w/o red meat i'm having difficulty getting enough protein, which is particularly important to avoid losing muscle mass at this age. so i last night made this extra-protein overnight oats and woke up excited to try. a miraculous ~50g protein. sadly it tasted god-awful and i'm never making it again.

nothing that involves human interaction can be orchestrated one-sidedly to preemptively ensure no harm, misunderstanding, changing of minds, blame or guilt. sorry but the whole project is wrong-headed and antithetical to what it means to be a human. there are no formulas, checklists, or guarantees.

Hubby, looking at me intently for a very long moment: You know who you look like right now? Me, expectant and fishing (as I was reading a romance novel): Oh I'm curious, tell me, who? Him, shoving his phone to my face:

A loose, energetic ink-and-watercolor comic book illustration of a cheerful girl, Stefi by Grazia Nidasio, with a big mop of spiky black hair, mid-stride with one arm raised in a wave and blushing cheeks. They wear blue jeans, red sneakers, and a colorful patchwork jacket in red, blue, green, and yellow, with a speech bubble reading "EHI... CI SI RIVEDE EH!" (Italian for roughly "Hey... see you around, eh!"). The style is spontaneous and gestural, showing her quirky energy.

BUT, the way to do this is to not "take a stand" for anything, because then you're just an asshole. With romance and sex, we're talking about your most vulnerable self and how you treat other people's most vulnerable selves. A rule of Socratic rigor flies out the window at this point.

i take it as a personal offense that so many people who don't know how to cook, don't respect food, and don't even seem to like food have become food influencers. i don't like this upside down version of the world. it's time to make things make sense again. i demand sense.

In 2014, we met with old friends in Chamonix for a reunion to attempt Mont Blanc. After a stormy, sleepless night at Tête Rousse, we continued but the weather kept getting worse. Crazy winds & approaching storms. We decided to turn back from Grand Couloir. Four people died on the mountain that day.

A woman in a red hooded jacket, me, stands at a railing on a high mountain viewpoint at Tête Rousse, turning to smile back at the camera, with white winter sunglasses pushed up on her head and climbing gear (harness, carabiners) at her waist. Behind her stretches a dramatic panorama of snow-streaked alpine peaks and ridges receding into haze, with a small mountain hut visible on the rocky slope to the right, likely a high station in the Alps.A mountaineer in a yellow jacket, black climbing pants, helmet, and crampons stands on a broad snowfield holding an ice axe, looking toward the camera. Behind, a team of three climbers ascends the same snowy slope, with a hut or supply cache on the rocks to the left and a sea of clouds spilling over the ridgeline below distant terrain, a high-altitude glacier climb.
Robert Evans (the Only Robert Evans)@iwriteok.bsky.social · last wk.

I'm weirdly happy People decided to publish this article. this lady got very close to the peak and decided to turn back because she wasn't totally confident in her technical ability. That's praiseworthy wisdom, and a good example for others. share.google/d8Xi4aZ8aKkW...