John Patterson

@jasper07.secondphase.com.au

"Such is life" https://secondphase.com.au

The anxiety of unfinished work used to stay at the keyboard. You walked the dog or went to the gym, and the work waited. With AI agents, the work keeps running. So instead of leaving work behind, you wake up wondering what your agents did overnight.

A friend told me he's interviewing for an architect role. For the next interview he has 15 minutes to explain what he's learnt about the programme, how he'd improve it, and what he'd do in his first 90 days. Honestly, I like it. It tests how you think.

A lot of enterprises have principles like buy vs build, and SI-first for development outside their core domain. I wonder how AI changes these. Build more, or use AI to write the glue between what we buy? Does that push SIs toward fractional, outcome-based engagements?

"We believe that rigorous use of AI helps a company like ours accelerate development, delight customers, and go head to head with competitors with vastly more resources. We believe that using AI is not a replacement for skill and craft, but an amplification." Culture eats breakfast for strategy

Charity Majors@charity.wtf · 3w ago

I wrote a new piece yesterday, called "Confessions of an Unrepentant Slop Snob", about my escalating rage at AI-generated text. It includes a framework for thinking about when AI involvement is fine -- just another tool -- and when it lands as a violation. charity.wtf/p/confession...

"I don't know the answer myself, but I asked a blowhard I know and he took a wild guess, here's what he said: " How I interpret pasted replies from an LLM in online conversations

At SAP #SITSyd on Friday, I was talking with other industry veterans, lamenting that 30 years later salaries and rates haven't gone up. We worked in tobacco, alcohol, building products, car manufacturing and steel. Most have disappeared, moved offshore or been made uncompetitive.