Tessera

Tal Orian Harel

@taloharel.bsky.social

PhD candidat at the Hebrew University, Communication department & PICR Lab. Studying affective polarization and intergroup conflict.

0 Posts67 Follower 94 Folgt

PICR Lab @picr-lab.bsky.social · last yr.

Thrilled to share that @eranhalperin75.bsky.social has been awarded ISPP's 2025 Sanford Award! 🏆 This honor recognizes his exceptional work in bridging political psychology research with real-world applications. Huge Congratulations Eran! 🎉 #ISPP2025

Shira Hebel-Sela @shirahebelsela.bsky.social · last yr.

🧵Excited to share two publications I've recently worked on! First, a chapter on "Personalized Psychological Intergroup Interventions" in Richard Petty, Andy Luttrell & Jacob Teeny's new Handbook of Personalized Persuasion 📚 www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edi...

Personalized Psychological Intergroup Interventions | 18 | A Three-Fac

The rise in intergroup animosity has led social and political psychologists to shift toward a more interventionist approach. However, unlike other scientific

taylorfrancis.com

mark brandt @mjbsp.bsky.social · 2y ago

Following the implementation of policies that were the "extreme version far beyond mainstream conservative positions" people in Israel shifted to the left on issues onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.... #socpsyc #polisky

Abstract for a paper that reads, How does the rise of ideologically extreme leaders affect attitudes and beliefs among their supporters? Previous research on paradoxical thinking suggests that when individuals are exposed to a radicalized version of their held beliefs, they moderate them in response. However, it is yet unknown whether, how, and among whom, such moderation occurs in response to radicalization of individuals' favored leaders. The proposed study examines how an unfolding real-world manifestation of a paradoxical thinking intervention—that is, the radical and extreme policies carried out by the newly elected Israeli government—affects the political attitudes of the government's supporters. Using a longitudinal design, we examined how pre-election attitudes (N = 589 government supporters) moderate, radicalize, or remain unchanged following the announcement and implementation of radical policies. Over four time points, we also examine the psychological mechanisms mediating the policies' moderating impact, to disentangle the reciprocal or paradoxical effects of radicalization among leaders on the public.

Ruthie Pliskin @pruthie.bsky.social · 2y ago

Political hope, anyone? When are leaders go fascist, previous supporters of those leaders actually go less fascist. See our registered-report longitudinal study, led by @shirahebelsela.bsky.social, Lee Aldar, and @taloharel.bsky.social, with Boaz Hameiri and Eran Halperin, here: tinyurl.com/3py5n6vb

Gone Too Far Elite Radicalization Hebel-Sela Aldar Orian Harel Political Psychology

Ana Leal @alleal.bsky.social · 2y ago

Does participating in collective action moralize one's attitudes over time, and if so, how? Happy to share that our paper is now out in JPSP! With Martijn van Zomeren, Roberto González, Ernestine Gordijn, Pia Carozzi, Michal Reifen Tagar, Belén Álvarez, Cristián Frigolett, and Eran Halperin. (1/9)