Timothy Oleksiak

@timothyoleksiak.bsky.social

Associate professor of rhetoric and writing, food eater, and enthusiastic lover of music Co-editor of Adequate (Utah State UP, 2026) I never claim to speak on behalf of any organization or group. My shares and thoughts are representative of a moment.

1) AI bots flood journals with crap submissions and overwhelm human infrastructure which slows down everything. 2) AI companies say AI services can help edit and review fast! I feel like I can see where this is heading. It’s as if we’ve seen this kind of predation before 🤔

El-Sayed: “I condemned that. I just didn’t try to make it political theater like you just did.” R emarkable response to Roger’s terrorist porn, word vomit. I can’t believe the clarity of assertion followed by the, literally the, best reframe of catalogs of violence GOP candidates love to offer.

I’m finishing up my first monograph on student-to-student peer review. What can we imagine together when we ask students to experience works in progress? It’s helped me articulate why *queer* feminist theorizing is still so deeply vital. I hope folks read it and see so much more than what it holds🤓

Among other folks, feminist rhetoricians and political theorists have critiqued civility resoundingly as a way to deny minoritized peoples participation. It’s not lost on me that the return to civility parallels attacks on women’s gender and sexuality studies and Africana studies, and, and, and…

Tressie McMillan Cottom@tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 2w ago

some descriptive statistics here on the civility industrial complex on college campuses that I haven’t seen analyzed before www.uncivilcollective.org/resources

About three months ago Tavia Nyong’o & I conceived of a collection of essays on The Epstein Class and the University meant to consider the ubiquity is sexual violence in the university & the fundamental fact that access to young women has long been a side perk of university employment & attendance.

A photograph of an art exhibit from the Donald J Trump and Jeffrey Epstein library showing a shelf of redacted Epstein files

I think if I teach 101, I am going to ask my students to write about two questions: 1) what has been left behind for you & by others for you to live fully? 2) what will you leave behind for others who you cannot imagine so that they may live fully?

I think it’s simpler than “we are playing by their rules”. It’s “we do not support any nomination from a corrupt grifter because such people are deeply untrustworthy. This president has depleted entirely his trustworthiness and credibility to put forth serious candidates.”

@achren.bsky.social · last wk.

If Dems win the Senate, they should refuse to confirm any SCOTUS appointment until after the next president is in office. It would just be playing by the R's rules but I doubt they have the guts to do it.

[edit] The book Venn I am going to suggest: This is WHO: American Oligarchs by Andrea Bernstein + This is WHY: Caliban & Witch + This is HOW: Capital Is Dead by McKenzie Wark anyone you see missing in that formulation is in: Golden Gulag.

“Now is not the time to quit, quietly or no. •Academic freedom is nothing other than intellectual autonomy from state, church, and corporate interests; •shared governance is workplace democracy; •peer review is a horizontally-run system of democratic expertise.”

Michael Bérubé@michael-berube.bsky.social · 5mo ago

I wrote about academic freedom and democracy for the Pittsburgh Review of Books, but I didn't say the usual things you would expect a person to say about academic freedom and democracy. I said other things instead. Hence the title of the essay! tinyurl.com/2skc3aum Thanks to Ed Simon for the gig.

The casual calm and confidence of White men is chilling to experience. He and I just fundamentally disagree on what’s happening. GPD and a healthy stock market is not a metric of collective human well being. Did you note too the “people are working longer days & getting more money for it” part?

Seth Kahn (he/him)@badpacifist.bsky.social · last wk.

At best, this is naive realism. He's not struggling financially, so nobody is, and anyone who says they are is wrong or lying. It's related to their hatred of empathy. If you admit that someone's experience is valid, you also have to admit that yours isn't universal, and we can't have that!