Chelsea Komlo

@chelseakomlo.bsky.social

(Real world) Cryptographer. chelseakomlo.com for more info.

My mom told me a quote today that my grandmother used to say after she would sign up for every free giveaway under the sun - “you can’t win if you don’t play.” And I kind of love that mentality for trying something in the face of overwhelming possibility of failure - generally the case in research

Happy new year! One of my New Year’s resolutions this year is to finally finish my gentle introduction to writing proofs in UC, for myself as well.. if anyone is interested in reviewing/contributing, please let me know! 🙌

After 3 years & 12 drafts, the RFC for FROST is complete! We hope this makes implementing FROST easier with fewer bugs 🐛 Thank you to everyone who helped by reviewing FROST security, submitting comments, and implementing the draft, this was a team effort 🙌💪 www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9591....

RFC 9591: The Flexible Round-Optimized Schnorr Threshold (FROST) Protocol for Two‑Round Schnorr Signatures

This document specifies the Flexible Round-Optimized Schnorr Threshold (FROST) signing protocol. FROST signatures can be issued after a threshold number of entities cooperate to compute a signature, ...

rfc-editor.org

If you are on a PC for an IACR conference, consider reaching out to the PC chairs to request “sticky reviews”, to allow reviews from prior submissions to IACR conferences to be visible! Let’s make science better! 💪

Nigel Smart@smartcryptology.bsky.social · 3y ago

This is actually possible with IACR venues and has been the case for over 10 years. They are called "sticky reviews". Trouble is most PC chairs do not promote them, or have forgotten

I wish conferences asked papers to submit feedback received from prior submission attempts and a discussion of how the authors improved the paper since then… so much context is lost between submission attempts across different venues

I was asked today what the upper bound is on number of signers in threshold signature schemes used in practice today and I didn’t have a good answer… I’m assuming consensus schemes are larger, but does anyone know of signing groups of > 20? That seems on the larger side

I wish there was more of a culture in cryptography of reaching out to authors to carefully double check claims before writing these claims in reviews or related work. I’ve seen *big* mistakes made- eg, by a reviewer that said my summary of my own prior work was wrong 🙃

I did this. Please do this; if you are a person who can get pregnant, have them on hand. I used AidAccess.org. I have a vision for care access where people can ask other people for abortion pills the way we call out for tampons in a public restroom. Though I suppose not in a *public* restroom.

Aid Access: Abortion Pills by Mail

Aid Access will help you order abortion pills by mail. We protect the health and human rights of anyone without access to local abortion pill services.

aidaccess.org

Imani Gandy@angryblacklady.blacksky.app · 3y ago

More Women Who Are Not Pregnant Are Ordering Abortion Pills Just in Case (gift link) www.nytimes.com/2024/01/02/h...

To anyone working on real-world cryptography- what would you like to see more of in cryptography research for 2024? Readable papers? Performance measurements? Accounting for specific failure cases? More PQ? Acceptance of non-standard assumptions? Solving certain problems?